State v. Public Service Commission, No. 19643.

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Missouri
Writing for the CourtWalker
Citation192 S.W. 958
Decision Date26 February 1917
Docket NumberNo. 19643.
PartiesSTATE ex rel. UNITED RYS. CO. OF ST. LOUIS v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI.
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
14 practice notes
  • State ex Inf. McKittrick v. Williams, No. 36718.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • November 9, 1940
    ...496, 132 S.W. 1085. The Legislature must obey the constitutional mandate of limitation. State ex rel. v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 270 Mo. 429, 192 S.W. 958; 16 C.J.S., sec. 62, p. 122; State ex rel. v. Koeln, 332 Mo. 1229, 61 S.W. (2d) 750; State ex rel. v. Gordon, 329 Mo. 1053, 49 S.W. (2d) 146; ......
  • State ex rel. City of Sikeston v. Pub. Serv. Comm., No. 33694.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • April 17, 1935
    ...Mo. 157, 256 S.W. 226; State v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 316 Mo. 233, 289 S.W. 785; State ex rel. United Rys. v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 270 Mo. 429, 192 S.W. 958; State ex rel. City of Sikeston v. Mo. Util. Co., 53 S.W. (2d) 394; Russell v. Sebastian, 233 U.S. 195; Interstate Trans. Co. v. Pub. Serv. C......
  • Stack v. General Baking Co., No. 26800.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • June 4, 1920
    ...Co. v. Railroad, 215 Mo. 658, loc. cit. 671, 672, 116 S. W. 530; State ex rel. v. Public Service Commission, 270 Mo. 429, loc. cit. 442, 192 S. W. 958, 198 S. W. 872. As said in the Lumber Co. Case, supra, 216 Mo. loc. cit. 672, 116 S. W. "The inartificial manner in which many of our s......
  • State ex rel. Kirkwood v. Publ. Serv. Comm., No. 31456.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • May 27, 1932
    ...service is wholly beyond the powers of the Commission to make or enter and wholly void. State ex rel. United Rys. Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 192 S.W. 958. Ordinance of City of Kirkwood No. 2613. If the appellant St. Louis Public Service Company were granted permission to abandon its right of ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
  • State ex Inf. McKittrick v. Williams, No. 36718.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • November 9, 1940
    ...496, 132 S.W. 1085. The Legislature must obey the constitutional mandate of limitation. State ex rel. v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 270 Mo. 429, 192 S.W. 958; 16 C.J.S., sec. 62, p. 122; State ex rel. v. Koeln, 332 Mo. 1229, 61 S.W. (2d) 750; State ex rel. v. Gordon, 329 Mo. 1053, 49 S.W. (2d) 146; ......
  • State ex rel. City of Sikeston v. Pub. Serv. Comm., No. 33694.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • April 17, 1935
    ...Mo. 157, 256 S.W. 226; State v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 316 Mo. 233, 289 S.W. 785; State ex rel. United Rys. v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 270 Mo. 429, 192 S.W. 958; State ex rel. City of Sikeston v. Mo. Util. Co., 53 S.W. (2d) 394; Russell v. Sebastian, 233 U.S. 195; Interstate Trans. Co. v. Pub. Serv. C......
  • Stack v. General Baking Co., No. 26800.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • June 4, 1920
    ...Co. v. Railroad, 215 Mo. 658, loc. cit. 671, 672, 116 S. W. 530; State ex rel. v. Public Service Commission, 270 Mo. 429, loc. cit. 442, 192 S. W. 958, 198 S. W. 872. As said in the Lumber Co. Case, supra, 216 Mo. loc. cit. 672, 116 S. W. "The inartificial manner in which many of our s......
  • State ex rel. Kirkwood v. Publ. Serv. Comm., No. 31456.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • May 27, 1932
    ...service is wholly beyond the powers of the Commission to make or enter and wholly void. State ex rel. United Rys. Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 192 S.W. 958. Ordinance of City of Kirkwood No. 2613. If the appellant St. Louis Public Service Company were granted permission to abandon its right of ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT