State v. Public Service Commission
Decision Date | 05 March 1918 |
Docket Number | No. 20392.,20392. |
Citation | 201 S.W. 1143,273 Mo. 632 |
Parties | STATE ex rel. MISSOURI PAC. RY. CO. et al. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Cole County; J. G. Slate, Judge.
Certiorari by the State, on the relation of the Missouri Pacific Railway Company and another, against the Public Service Commission of Missouri. From an adverse judgment, the Commission appeals. Affirmed.
This is an appeal by the Public Service Commission from a judgment rendered in the circuit court of Cole county, whereby an order made by the Public Service Commission was modified.
Upon a hearing by the Public Service Commission of a complaint filed by A. B. Cole, as mayor of the city of California, against the Missouri Pacific Railway Company, and Benjamin F. Bush, the receiver thereof, wherein a better and more adequate interstate train service was prayed for, the Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission) made therein, so far as is pertinent to the points involved, the below order, to wit:
"Now after due deliberation it is ordered: That the defendants, the Missouri Pacific Railway Company and B. F. Bush, receiver of the Missouri Pacific Railway Company, be required from and after the effective date of this order and until the further order of this Commission to regularly stop their east-bound passenger train No. 2 at California, Mo., and to stop their west-bound passenger train No. 5 at California, Mo., on flag; that is, to take on passengers for points beyond California, Mo., where stops are made by said trains, or to let off passengers boarding said trains at other points at which such trains stop."
Upon the hearing before the Commission, the defendants therein, who are the relators here (and are hereinafter for brevity so styled), in effect conceded in their testimony the justness of the order of the Commission, as to the stop thereby required to be made at California by relators' east-bound passenger train No. 2, and in the exceptions which relators filed to the finding and order of the Commission no complaint is made of such part of said order as refers to train No. 2.
Upon the entering by the Commission of the order above recited, and following the conventional procedure in that behalf, defendants sued out a writ of certiorari in the circuit court of Cole county; wherein, the regular judge of said court having disqualified himself, Judge A. W. Walker, of the Ninth circuit, was called in and sat upon the trial as special judge, and on a hearing therein de novo, rendered the below judgment, to wit:
From this judgment the Commission, after the usual motions and procedure, has appealed. The evidentiary facts, since they are in our view decisive of all of the questions involved herein, will be found in the discussion of the law, which we think ought to apply to the case.
Alex. Z. Patterson, General Counsel, and James D. Lindsay, Asst. Counsel, both of Jefferson City, for Public Service Commission. James F. Green and H. H. Larimore, both of St. Louis, for respondents.
FARIS, J. (after stating the facts as above).
This case turns wholly upon the facts; for the law, so far at least as concerns its general terms, is well-settled. The rule in such cases has been repeatedly stated; never more clearly and carefully perhaps, certainly never more authoritatively, than by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Mississippi Railroad Corn. v. Illinois Central Railroad, 203 U. S. loc. cit. 344, 27 Sup. Ct. 94, 51 L. Ed. 209, where it was said:
The identical general rule is stated in the later case of Herndon v. Railroad, 218 U. S. loc. cit. 153, 30 Sup. Ct. 633, 54 L. Ed. 970, as also in divers other cases decided by the Supreme Court of the United States, which is empowered to speak upon this subject the decisive and authoritative and last word. Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Illinois, 163 U. S. 142, 16 Sup. Ct. 1096, 41 L. Ed. 107; Gladson v. Minnesota, 166 U. S. 427, 17 Sup. Ct. 627, 41 L. Ed. 1064; Lake Shore, etc., Ry. Co. v. Ohio, 173 U. S. 285, 19 Sup. Ct. 465, 43 L. Ed. 702; Cleveland, etc., Ry. Co. v. Illinois, 177 U. S. 514, 20 Sup. Ct. 722, 44 L. Ed. 868; Atlantic Coast Line Co. v. Wharton, 207 U. S. 328, 28 Sup. Ct. 121, 52 L. Ed. 230; Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Ry. Co. v. Railroad Cora. of Wisconsin, 237 U. S. 220, 35 Sup. Ct. 560, 59 L. Ed. 926; Atlantic Coast Line v. North Carolina Corp. Com., 206 U. S. 1, 27 Sup. Ct. 585, 51 L. Ed. 933, 11 Ann. Cas. 398; Oregon Railroad, etc., Co. v. Fairchild, 224 U. S. 510, 32 Sup. Ct. 535, 56 L. Ed. 863; Railroad v. Vant Santwood, Public Service Com. (D. C.) 216 Fed. 252; Ohage v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co., 200 Fed. 128, 118 C. C. A. 302.
In the case of Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. Co. v. Railroad Com. of Wisconsin, supra, 237 U. S. at page 226, 35 Sup. Ct. 562, 59 L. Ed. 926, it was said:
Applying the above rules to the conceded facts of this case, we conclude that the modification ordered to be made by the court nisi in the order of the Commission was a proper one, and that the judgment below ought to be affirmed. This modification, as by reference to the statement of facts will more clearly appear, consisted in relieving the railroad from the necessity of having to stop its west-bound train (No. 5) except to put...
To continue reading
Request your trial- The State ex rel. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company v. Public Service Commission of Missouri
-
Lusk, Nixon & Biddle, Receivers of St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Public Service Commission
... ... power to require the operation of trains 801 and 802 through ... Caruthersville, since such sections expressly give the ... Commission power to order "additional facilities" ... or to direct "changes in any thereof in use." (4) ... It is now well established that it is proper for a state to ... provide by statute, or direction of a legislative commission, ... for local improvements of facilities, or for the adoption of ... reasonable measures in the interest of the health, safety and ... welfare of the public, notwithstanding the fact that such ... regulations may incidentally ... ...
-
State ex rel. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company v. Public Service Commission
...appears in 254 U.S. 535. A number of Federal cases are cited in the case of State ex rel. Pub. Serv. Comm. 273 Mo. l. c. 632 at 636, 201 S.W. 1143. 10 stopped at three points in Missouri, but all three points were terminals. At Monett the trains stopped in order to set out a combination mai......
- State ex rel. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Public Service Commission