State v. Public Service Commission
Decision Date | 30 June 1917 |
Docket Number | No. 20088.,No. 20061.,20061.,20088. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Parties | STATE ex rel. MISSOURI, K. & T. RY. CO. et al. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION et al. STATE ex rel. WABASH RY. CO. v. SAME. |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Randolph County; A. W. Walker, Judge.
Certiorari by the State of Missouri, on the relation of the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company and others and the Wabash Railway Company, to review an order of the Public Service Commission, ordering a subway at a street crossing of the roads to be constructed, and apportioning the cost between them and the city of Moberly. The order was affirmed, and the Railroads appeal. Judgment affirmed.
This proceeding was originally instituted before the Public Service Commission by the city of Moberly asking the Commission to require the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company and the Wabash Railway Company to bear a portion of the expense in constructing a subway at the Rollins street crossing of said railway companies' tracks in said city of Moberly. Upon a hearing, the Public Service Commission ordered the subway to be constructed at an estimated cost of $44,700, and apportioned the cost of the same as follows: To the Wabash Railway Company, $18,246; to the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company, $14,759; to the city of Moberly, $11,695.
Upon certiorari, the order of the Public Service Commission was reviewed and affirmed by the circuit court of Randolph county. Thereupon each of said railway companies appealed to this court. The appeals were separate. The appeal of the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company et al. is numbered 20061 in this court, and the appeal of the Wabash Railway Company is numbered 20088. Since both appeals involve the same record, and practically the same legal propositions, they were argued together in this court, and treated as consolidated, and we will so treat them in this opinion. A sufficient understanding of the issues and facts involved may be had from the following excerpts from the opinion of the Public Service Commission:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kansas City v. Terminal Railway Co.
...the Constitution of Missouri completes this result. Sec. 10459, R.S. 1919; Am. Tobacco Co. v. St. Louis, 247 Mo. 374; State ex rel. Ry. Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 271 Mo. 270; State ex rel. v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 272 Mo. 645; Chicago etc. Railroad Co. v. Chicago, 166 U.S. 226; Chicago etc. Rail......
-
State ex rel. Wabash Ry. Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm.
...Ry. Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 306 Mo. 149, 267 S.W. 108; Kansas City v. Ry. Co., 25 S.W. (2d) 1066-1067; State ex rel. M.K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 271 Mo. 270, 197 S.W. 56, P.U.R. 1918A, 96; St. Louis v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 276 Mo. 526; Kansas City v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 210 S.W. 382;......
-
Kansas City v. Kansas City Terminal Ry. Co.
...Service Commission to assess against the railroad companies more than one-half of the cost of widening and reconstructing the subway. At page 287 (271 Mo.), Judge Williams, speaking for the Court en Banc, said: "Assuming (but without deciding) that the above mentioned contract was in fact d......
-
Kalbfell v. City of St. Louis
... ... Louis, Charles J. Riley, Director of Public Safety of the City of St. Louis, Albert H. Baum, Building Commissioner of ... Mo.App. 467, 149 S.W. 36; Potashnick Truck Service v ... City of Sikeston, 351 Mo. 505, 173 S.W.2d 96; ... Tebbets v ... 171, 35 S.Ct. 511, 59 L.Ed. 900; City ... of St. Louis v. Commission & Inv. Co., 226 Mo. 148, 126 ... S.W. 166; Pierce Oil Corp. v. Hope, ... Co., 317 Mo. 907, 915, 296 S.W. 993, 996, ... 54 A.L.R. 1082; State ex rel. Triangle Fuel Co. v ... Caulfield, 355 Mo. 330, 335, 196 S.W ... ...