State v. Quail
Decision Date | 21 October 1914 |
Citation | 28 Del. 310,92 A. 859 |
Court | Court of General Sessions of Delaware |
Parties | STATE v. THEODORE QUAIL |
Court of General Sessions, Kent County, October Term, 1914.
Theodore Quail was charged with unlawfully carrying concealed a deadly weapon.
INDICTMENT (No. 12, October Term, 1914) alleging--
"that Theodore Quail, late of Mispilion Hundred, on the fourteenth day of October, 1914, with force and arms at Mispilion Hundred did then and there unlawfully carry concealed a deadly weapon upon and about his person, other than an ordinary pocket knife, namely, a revolver," etc.
At the trial the state proved that at the time and place laid in the indictment there was found concealed upon the person of the accused an unloaded revolver.
Counsel for accused thereupon asked the court to instruct the jury to return a verdict of not guilty because of a variance between the proof and the allegation in the indictment, in that the indictment charged the accused with carrying concealed a deadly weapon, namely, a revolver, while the proof showed that he carried concealed an unloaded revolver, which was not, in that condition, a deadly weapon. Chapter 548, Volume 16, Laws of Delaware, Rev. Code, p. 987, § 1, 25 Del. Laws, c. 252.
John B Hutton, Deputy Attorney General, for the state.
Thomas C. Frame, Jr., for the accused.
OPINION
The defendant asks that the jury be instructed to return a verdict of not guilty, because it appears from the evidence of the state that the revolver found upon the prisoner's person was unloaded. The statute upon which the indictment is based is in the following language:
The manifest policy and intent of this law is to prevent carrying concealed a revolver or other weapon which may be used for a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hirschfeld v. Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms, Tobacco & Explosives
..., 9 S.W. 702, 703 (Ky. 1888), was brief and decided on jurisdictional, rather than Second Amendment, grounds. State v. Quail , 92 A. 859, 859 (Del.Gen.Sess. 1914), addressed only whether a concealed unloaded revolver could still be considered a concealed "deadly weapon" and did not consider......
-
Hirschfeld v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives
...to any minor" as "protective laws enacted to prevent occurrences" like the accidental shooting in that case); State v. Quail, 28 Del. 310, 92 A. 859, 859 (Del. Gen. Sess. 1914) (refusing to dismiss indictment based on statute criminalizing "knowingly sell[ing] a deadly weapon to a minor oth......
-
Travers v. Hartmann
... ... would have done to prevent the accident ... The ... following are respectively provisions of the statute law of ... this state, and, by resolution of the street and sewer ... department of the City of Wilmington, ordinances of the city ... Section ... 14, Chapter ... ...
-
Papella v. State
... ... established, this court has recently held that an unloaded ... revolver is a deadly weapon within the meaning of the act; ... and used language which showed an intention to apply the same ... rule to a defective weapon--citing State v. Quail, 5 ... Boyce 310, 92 A. 859 ... Verdict, guilty with recommendation to extreme mercy ... William ... G. Jones, Jr., for accused below appellant ... Armon ... D. Chaytor, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for the state ... Judges ... BOYCE and RICE ... ...