State v. Ratley
Decision Date | 09 July 1993 |
Docket Number | No. 68,474,68,474 |
Citation | 253 Kan. 394,855 P.2d 943 |
Parties | STATE of Kansas, Appellant, v. Gary M. RATLEY, Appellee. |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court
1. When the district court has made findings of fact and conclusions of law, the function of this court on appeal is to determine whether the findings are supported by substantial competent evidence and whether the findings are sufficient to support the district court's conclusions of law.
2. Substantial evidence is evidence which possesses both relevance and substance and which furnishes a substantial basis of fact from which the issues can reasonably be resolved. Stated in another way, "substantial evidence" is such legal and relevant evidence as a reasonable person might accept as being sufficient to support a conclusion.
3. K.S.A. 22-2905(2), which provides that when a defendant is bound over to the district court by the magistrate following a preliminary hearing, the prosecuting attorney shall file an information in the office of the clerk of the district court, is directory rather than mandatory.
4. The county or district attorney is the representative of the State in criminal proceedings. He or she has the authority to dismiss any charge or reduce any charge.
5. In a criminal action where the State and the defendant entered into an agreement which specified the single charge which would be filed against the defendant, and the defendant fully performed his obligation under the agreement, the record is examined and it is held the district court did not err or abuse its discretion in: (1) finding that a valid agreement existed; (2) finding that the State had breached the agreement in filing an alternative count information; and (3) ordering specific performance of the agreement by striking the alternative count which was in violation of the terms of the agreement.
Kyle G. Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause and was on the brief for appellant.
Dennis W. Moore of Moriarty, Erker & Moore, Overland Park, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellee.
This is an appeal by the State from the order of the district court dismissing one count of an information.
On July 5, 1990, agents from the Kansas Bureau of Investigation (KBI), Anderson County Sheriff's Office, and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms executed a consent search on defendant Gary M. Ratley's farm. They seized growing marijuana plants and packages of marijuana and arrested the defendant.
KBI Special Agent Tom Williams questioned the defendant. Craig Cole, Anderson County Attorney, authorized Williams to enter into an agreement with the defendant on behalf of the State. The agreement was prepared by Williams and signed by himself and the defendant before a notary public. The agreement provides:
The defendant filed a motion to enforce the agreement, contending the filing of an information charging the defendant with possession of marijuana with intent to sell and, alternatively, with the cultivation of marijuana violated the agreement. The district court sustained the motion, making findings of fact and setting forth its rationale as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Orr, 72257
...or other inferences that might be drawn therefrom. State v. Rowell, 256 Kan. 200, 213, 883 P.2d 1184 (1994); State v. Ratley, 253 Kan. 394, 398, 855 P.2d 943 (1993); State v. McKeown, 249 Kan. 506, 515, 819 P.2d 644 (1991). At the same time, both the performance and prejudice components of ......
-
Weber v. Tillman
...Corp., 253 Kan. 373, 377-78, 855 P.2d 929 (1993); see State v. Rowell, 256 Kan. 200, 213, 883 P.2d 1184 (1994); State v. Ratley, 253 Kan. 394, 398, 855 P.2d 943 (1993); State v. McKeown, 249 Kan. 506, 515, 819 P.2d 644 Dr. Tillman's salary for the last 6 months of employment was $72,000. Th......
-
State v. Raschke
...that findings of fact, conclusions of law be set forth "not essential to" preserving party's appeal to district court); State v. Ratley, 253 Kan. 394, 855 P.2d 943 (1993) (statute requiring prosecuting attorney to file information in office of clerk when defendant bound over from municipal ......
-
State v. Ralston
...to support the district court's conclusions of law. Hodges v. Johnson, 288 Kan. 56, 65, 199 P.3d 1251 (2009); State v. Ratley, 253 Kan. 394, 398, 855 P.2d 943 (1993). "Substantial evidence is evidence which possesses both relevance and substance and which furnishes a substantial basis of fa......