State v. Reakey

Citation1 Mo.App. 3
PartiesTHE STATE OF MISSOURI, Defendant in Error, v. HENRY REAKEY, Plaintiff in Error.
Decision Date26 January 1876
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

1. An indictment for murder, which states that the assault, but not that the wounding which caused death, was willful, deliberate, and premeditated held to be insufficient to support a conviction.

2. The manner in which the murder was committed must appear with certainty in the indictment.

3. The indictment must lay the time of death within a year and a day from the wounding.

4. An indictment that concludes, " against the peace and dignity of the state, and against the form of the statute," etc., is not bad as not concluding " against the peace and dignity of the state."

5. The word " immediately" will not supply the place of " then and there" in an indictment.

ERROR to Lincoln Circuit Court.

Reversed and remanded.

Wm. A. Alexander, for plaintiff in error, cited Wag. Stat. 445, sec. 1; State v. Jones, 20 Mo. 58; Old Const., sec. 26; Art. 6, New Const., sec. 38; State v. Loper, 19 Mo. 254; State v. Manafield, 41 Mo. 470.

Josiah Creech, Circuit Attorney, for defendant in error.

OPINION

BAKEWELL J.

Henry Reakey was indicted at the fall term of the Circuit Court of Lincoln county, in October, 1875, for the murder of his wife. He was tried and convicted of murder in the first degree. Motions in arrest and for a new trial were made and overruled, and, exceptions being properly taken, the case is brought here by writ of error.

The counsel for appellant contend that the motion in arrest should have been sustained by reason of the insufficiency of the indictment.

The indictment is as follows:

" State of Missouri, county of Lincoln. The grand jurors of the State of Missouri, summoned from the body of Lincoln county, impaneled, charged, and sworn, upon their oaths present that Henry Reakey, late of the county aforesaid, on or about the 9th day of September, A. D. 1875, at the county of Lincoln, State aforesaid, did feloniously, willfully, deliberately, premeditatedly, on purpose, and of his malice aforethought, make an assault on and upon the body of one Eliza Reakey, and that the said Henry Reakey, at the time and place as aforesaid, with a stick or cudgel of some kind unknown to these jurors, and with his opened right hand, the same being deadly weapons, the which the said Henry Reakey then and there held in his hand or hands, to, at, and against the said Eliza Reakey, he, the said Henry Reakey, then and there feloniously, on purpose, and of his malice aforethought, with said stick or cudgel of some kind unknown to these jurors, as aforesaid, did strike, penetrate, bruise, and wound the said Eliza Reakey, in and upon the right side of the forehead, immediately over the right eye, fracturing the skull of the said Eliza Reakey with said stick or cudgel as aforesaid, and in and upon the throat, with his open right hand, seized, choked, suffocated, and strangled her, the said Eliza Reakey, thereby giving her, the said Eliza Reakey, then and there, with the said stick or cudgel of some kind unknown to these jurors as aforesaid, and with his open right hand as aforesaid, by means of striking, penetrating, bruising, choking, suffocating, strangling, and wounding the said Eliza Reakey as aforesaid, two mortal wounds in and upon the right side of the forehead, immediately over the right eye, and in and upon the throat of her, the said Eliza Reakey, of which said mortal wounds, from the said stick or cudgel, and from the said choking and strangling her with the said right hand as aforesaid, the said Eliza Reakey immediately died.

And so the jurors aforesaid, upon their oaths aforesaid, do say that the said Henry Reakey, in the manner and by the means aforesaid, feloniously, willfully, deliberately, premeditatedly, of his malice aforethought, did kill and murder the said Eliza Reakey, as above stated, against the peace and dignity of the State, and contrary to the form of the statute in such cases made and provided by the State."

Is this indictment, under our statute, sufficient to support a conviction for murder in the first degree?

1. It sets forth that the assault was willful, deliberate, and premeditated, but it does not state that the wounding bruising, and penetrating by which death is alleged to have been effected were willful, or...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT