State v. Reynolds
Decision Date | 12 October 1891 |
Citation | 17 S.W. 322,106 Mo. 146 |
Parties | STATE v. REYNOLDS. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
2. On the trial of an indictment in the words of the statute for an attempt to defraud one W. W. S., the state introduced in evidence an order purporting to be drawn by Mrs. M. J. S. for the payment of $10 to defendant, but not addressed to any one, accompanied by evidence that such order was presented to the clerks of a firm of which S. was a partner and general business manager, with the representation that M. J. S. was the wife of S. Held a fatal variance.
Appeal from circuit court, Greene county; W. D. HUBBARD, Judge.
Indictment of E. S. Reynolds for a felonious attempt to obtain money by false pretenses. Verdict of guilty. Defendant appealed. Reversed.
F. M. Wolff, O. H. Travers, and Hill & Danford, for appellant. John M. Wood, Atty. Gen., for the State.
Defendant was tried and convicted under the following indictment: "The grand jurors of the state of Missouri, impaneled, sworn, and charged to inquire within and for the body of Greene county, upon their oath present that one E. S. Johnson, alias E. S. Reynolds, late of the county and state aforesaid, on or about the 10th day of February, 1888, at the county of Greene and state of Missouri, with intent to cheat and defraud, did then and there unlawfully and feloniously attempt to obtain from William W. Smith ten dollars, of the value of ten dollars his money and property, by means and by use of a cheat and a fraud, and a trick and a deception, and a false and fraudulent representation and statement, contrary to the forms of the statutes in such cases made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the state." The prosecution was for offenses enumerated under section 1561, Rev. St. 1879. On the trial, the prosecution, to sustain the charge in the indictment, introduced the following order: This order was presented by defendant to the clerks of the firm of J. Rodecker & Co., in which William W. Smith was a partner and business manager, and payment requested. Def...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Quinn
...State v. Fay, 65 Mo. 490; State v. Smith, 31 Mo. 120; State v. Griffie, 118 Mo. 188, 230 Mo. 680; State v. Mohr, 55 Mo.App. 325; State v. Reynolds, 106 Mo. 146; State Horn 93 Mo. 190; State v. Sherrill, 278 S.W. 992, 277 Mo. 228. Roy McKittrick, Attorney General, Wm. Orr Sawyers and Lawrenc......
-
Tyler v. Hall
... ... following-described tracts [106 Mo. 318] or parcels of land, ... situate in the county of Johnson and state of Missouri, ... to-wit: All my present right, title and interest, which I ... inherited from my father, Sylvester Hall, late of Pettis ... ...
-
State v. Price, 42288
...State v. Herman, Mo.Sup., 162 S.W.2d 873. They are not in point. He also cites State v. Horn, 93 Mo. 190, 6 S.W. 96, and State v. Reynolds, 106 Mo. 146, 17 S.W. 322. These cases were written when the statute on cheats and frauds set forth a form of information that required the name of the ......
-
Tyler v. Hall
... ... , and described the interest conveyed as follows: "The following described tracts or parcels of land, situate in the county of Johnson and state of Missouri, to-wit: All my present right, title, and interest which I inherited from my father, Sylvester Hall, late of Pettis county, Mo., as one ... ...