State v. Rice

Citation148 N.J.Super. 145,372 A.2d 349
PartiesSTATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Lumas A. RICE, Defendant, and International Fidelity Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant.
Decision Date25 February 1977
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division

Vincent N. Macri, East Orange, for defendant-appellant (Gold & Macri, attorneys; Jack Gold, East Orange, on the brief).

Frank A. Tunnero, Newark, for plaintiff-respondent (Francis Patrick McQuade, Essex County Counsel, Newark, attorney; Richard M. Cignarella, First Asst. County Counsel, East Orange, on the statement in lieu of brief).

Before Judges LYNCH, MILMED and ANTELL.

PER CURIAM.

The order under review is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Scalera in his opinion of November 24, 1975, 137 N.J.Super. 593, 350 A.2d 95 (Cty.Ct.1975).

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • State v. Sanders
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • July 9, 1987
    ...sentence after conviction.' ") (quoting State v. Rice, 137 N.J.Super. 593, 601, 350 A.2d 95 (Law Div.1975), aff'd o.b., 148 N.J.Super. 145, 372 A.2d 349 (App.Div.1977)), certif. denied, 81 N.J. 354, 407 A.2d 1227 (1979).10 0ur analysis of the double jeopardy clause of the New Jersey Constit......
  • State v. Causey
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • May 18, 1983
    ...bond by surrendering the defendant into custody. R. 3:26-7 and State v. Rice, 137 N.J.Super. 593, 602 (Law Div.1975), aff'd. 148 N.J.Super. 145 (App.Div.1977). This alternative is always open to the Surety and is a way that it can be released from the bond if it feels that the defendant is ......
  • U.S. v. Martinez
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • January 14, 1980
    ...addresses the issue presented. 10 In State v. Rice, 137 N.J.Super. 593, 350 A.2d 95 (Essex County Ct. 1975), Aff'd mem., 148 N.J.Super. 145, 372 A.2d 349 (App.Div.1977), a New Jersey court merely held that a surety would not be released by any trial court action short of acquittal or convic......
  • State v. Singletary
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • August 19, 1977
    ...N.J. 351, 351, 364, 294 A.2d 245 (1972); State v. Rice, 137 N.J.Super. 593, 599, 350 A.2d 95 (Law Div. 1975), affirmed 148 N.J.Super. 145, 372 A.2d 349 (App.Div. 1977). In order to be released on bail defendant and his surety enter into a contract with the State. That contract consists of t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT