State v. Richey

Citation64 Ohio St.3d 353,595 N.E.2d 915
Decision Date12 August 1992
Docket NumberNo. 90-338,90-338
PartiesThe STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. RICHEY, Appellant.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Ohio

Around 4:15 a.m., on June 30, 1986, in Columbus Grove, Ohio, a raging fire broke out in Hope Collins's second-floor apartment, killing Cynthia Collins, Hope's two-year-old daughter. Less than an hour before, Hope had left her apartment after Kenneth T. Richey, defendant-appellant, agreed to baby-sit Cynthia. Circumstantial evidence established that while in Hope's apartment Richey had spread gasoline and paint thinner around the apartment and ignited it.

Richey, Hope, Peggy Price, Candy Barchet, Richey's ex-girlfriend, and a variety of other witnesses to these events lived at the Old Farm Village Apartments in Columbus Grove. Peggy and Hope lived in adjacent second-floor apartments, and Candy lived directly below Hope. All three apartments were in Building or Section "A" at Old Farm Village. Candy and her infant son moved into their apartment around June 15, and she met Richey. Within a few days, Candy and Richey formed a sexual relationship, and Richey frequently told Candy he loved her and "would kill any other guys" she was with.

On June 24, Richey learned that Candy had just been in bed with John Butler, and Richey pulled a knife on Butler. In response, Butler "bounced him around the room a little bit." Just after that fracas, Richey broke his hand by punching a door, requiring a splint.

On Sunday evening, June 29, Candy took her new boyfriend, Mike Nichols, to a party in Peggy's apartment; during the party, Candy kissed Nichols openly and told Richey that she wanted to date Nichols. Richey became upset at this news. When Candy went home, around 1:00 a.m., she asked Nichols to spend the night with her, which he did.

That night, Richey wore his Marine Corps camouflage fatigues and combat boots, and he still had his right hand bandaged in a splint. Some witnesses reported Richey was intoxicated. Jeffrey Kezar recalled Richey saying, "If I can't have her [Candy], nobody else can."

Richey told several persons that Building "A" would burn that night and he would use his Marine training to do that. Robert Dannenberger described Richey as "very upset" and said Richey threatened to blow the place up since he had "learned how to do explosives" in the Marines. Peggy Price became upset, and Richey told her, "Well, instead of blowing it up, I'll torch A Section." Price recalled that Richey said, "Before the night is over, part of A Building is going to burn down." Shirley Baker also recalls Richey saying, "A Building was going to burn * * *." Juanita Altimus, while just outside her own apartment, overheard Richey say on the landing, "Building A was going to burn tonight."

By 2:00 a.m., the party was breaking up, and Richey kept asking Hope if he could spend the night on her sofa. Hope refused. Around 2:20 a.m., June 30, Richey offered to steal some flowers for Peggy from a greenhouse across the street, but Peggy told Richey not to bring them to her.

Between 3:00 and 3:30 a.m., Dennis Smith drove up and asked Hope to go with him. Hope replied she did not have a baby-sitter, but Richey said, "Well, I'll keep an eye on her [Cynthia], if you'll let me sleep on your couch." A neighbor also overheard Hope say to Richey, "Go upstairs with Scootie [Cynthia's nickname]--she's asleep--but don't lock the door because I can't get back in because I don't have a key."

Around 4:15 a.m., neighbors reported bright orange flames and smoke coming out of the Collins apartment, and the fire department responded. Firemen saw several feet of flames from the apartment and deck curl up over the roof. A resident and a fireman both started into the apartment, but the heat and fire were too intense. A fireman then went back in, with oxygen, but he could not find Cynthia and soon ran out of oxygen.

Ultimately, several firemen, with fire hoses and oxygen masks, succeeded in removing Cynthia's body from her burning bedroom. Cynthia died from asphyxia related to smoke inhalation.

When the firemen arrived, Richey was either at the Collins apartment or he arrived shortly thereafter; he was screaming that a child was still inside. One fireman saw him coming out of the apartment, helped him up, and had to restrain him to keep him from going back in. Richey was combative, argumentative, and interfered with efforts to fight the fire and rescue Cynthia. Two deputy sheriffs overpowered Richey and turned him over to Police Chief Thomas Miller to keep him out of the way.

During the fire, Richey asked Nichols, "Why don't we finish it now, since you think you're so bad[?]" Richey also asked Candy if the fire had scared her. When she replied it had, Richey told her, "if he couldn't have me, that nobody would * * *." Altimus reported that Richey, as he looked over the fire damage, drank a beer, laughed, and said, "It looks like I did a helluva good job, don't it."

Richey admitted that he had earlier gotten two plants from the K & J Greenhouse for Candy, and police found those plants outside Candy's apartment. The K & J owner identified them as having been stolen from his greenhouse. Richey had also offered to steal two plants for Peggy that evening. The K & J owner confirmed that paint thinner and gasoline were kept in two unlocked storage sheds. Gasoline and paint thinner could have been stolen from these sheds; the owner did not know if any was missing.

Assistant State Fire Marshal Robert Cryer concluded from the physical evidence and burn patterns that an accelerant had been used. An accelerant had been poured on the apartment's wooden deck, the fire's point of origin, as well as the living room rug. A smoke detector had been pulled from the ceiling before the fire. The fire was a very fast, hot, intense fire because of the accelerant.

Gregory DuBois, a consulting engineer, agreed that the fire had been caused by arson and that accelerants had been used. One rug sample from the Collins apartment contained gasoline, and another rug sample revealed paint thinner. Wood chips from that apartment's deck also contained paint thinner. However, laboratory tests failed to reveal any accelerants on Richey's fatigues or boots.

Chief Miller interviewed Richey as a witness on the morning of June 30 and also obtained his statement in the afternoon after advising him of his rights. By July 1, the investigation had focused on Richey, and police arrested Richey for arson and took further statements after advising him of his rights. Police tape-recorded an interview of Richey on July 1. Fire Marshal Cryer and Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Randy Bassinger participated in that interview.

In these statements, Richey maintained that he had been drunk on June 30 and did not remember much. However, he denied starting the fire or knowing how it started. He also denied that Hope had asked him to baby-sit Cynthia, and claimed that he had been at his father's apartment when the fire began. Richey did admit that he knew Cynthia was in Hope's apartment; he had stopped and looked in on her while she was sleeping during the party. Richey also claimed that he had secret ways with witnesses so they would not testify against him. In a later statement, he said he would cut the prosecutor's throat.

A grand jury indicted Richey for aggravated murder with a specification alleging murder in the course of arson, aggravated arson, breaking and entering (the greenhouse), involuntary manslaughter, and child endangering. A panel of three judges convicted Richey of all charges, save the manslaughter charge, which was dropped. Following a presentence investigation, mental evaluation, and mitigation hearing, the panel sentenced Richey to death for aggravated murder and consecutive prison terms for the other offenses. The court of appeals affirmed the convictions and sentence.

Daniel R. Gerschutz, Pros. Atty., for appellee.

Randall M. Dana, Ohio Public Defender, Jane P. Perry and Kevin L. Fahey, Columbus, for appellant.

MOYER, Chief Justice

We have reviewed appellant's twenty-three propositions of law, independently assessed the evidence relating to the death sentence, balanced the aggravating circumstance against the mitigating factors, and compared the sentence to those imposed in similar cases. As a result, we affirm the convictions and sentence of death.

I Evidence of Threats

In his first proposition of law, Richey argues that admitting evidence of his threats destroyed the constitutionally required reliability and fairness of his trial and sentence. This evidence included the following. Richey told Deputy Roy Sargent on November 19 that "Randy Bassinger [the prosecutor] was a dead man" and that "whoever testified against him had better hope he's six feet under." On August 17, Richey told Deputy Mike Ball to take a message to Randy Bassinger, "that when he got out he was going to cut his throat."

While in pretrial confinement, Richey initiated conversations with his jailers about the offenses charged against him. Richey's threats were simply part of those conversations. Although Richey moved to suppress these statements, he did not object specifically to evidence of the threats. Hence, the issue is waived except for plain error. State v. Williams (1977), 51 Ohio St.2d 112, 5 O.O.3d 98, 364 N.E.2d 1364; State v. Long (1978), 53 Ohio St.2d 91, 7 O.O.3d 178, 372 N.E.2d 804.

Richey's threats reflect a consciousness of his guilt, similar to evidence of flight to avoid prosecution, or efforts made to cover up a crime or intimidate witnesses. See State v. Eaton (1969), 19 Ohio St.2d 145, 48 O.O.2d 188, 249 N.E.2d 897 (flight from justice may indicate a consciousness of guilt); Cleveland v. McNea (1952), 158 Ohio St. 138, 142, 48 O.O. 68, 70, 107 N.E.2d 201, 203 (suppression of adverse evidence constitutes a prejudicial circumstance of much weight); State v. Huffman (1912), 86 Ohio St. 229, 99 N.E....

To continue reading

Request your trial
497 cases
  • State v. Lawson
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • October 7, 2021
    ..." not a matter of law. State v. Davis , 139 Ohio St.3d 122, 2014-Ohio-1615, 9 N.E.3d 1031, ¶ 62, quoting State v. Richey , 64 Ohio St.3d 353, 369-370, 595 N.E.2d 915 (1992), abrogated in part on other grounds as stated in State v. McGuire , 80 Ohio St.3d 390, 402-403, 686 N.E.2d 1112 (1997)......
  • State v. Eley
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • December 18, 1996
    ...St.3d 64, 21 OBR 363, 488 N.E.2d 142." State v. Benner (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 301, 317, 533 N.E.2d 701, 718; State v. Richey (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 353, 366, 595 N.E.2d 915, 927; State v. Brown (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 476, 481, 597 N.E.2d 97, 101. Eley's failure to invoke the rule waived any er......
  • State v. Beverly Seymour
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • November 9, 1993
    ... ... testimony will deprive the defendant of a fair adjudication ... of the allegations placed in issue by the witness' trial ... testimony." ... See, ... also, State v. Lawson (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 336, 595 ... N.E.2d 902; State v. Richey (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d ... 353, 595 N.E.2d 915; State ex rel. Collins v ... O'Farrell (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 142, 573 N.E.2d 113 ... The question of whether a particularized need exists is a ... question of fact that rests within the discretion of the ... trial ... ...
  • State v. Phillips
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • November 22, 1995
    ...error committed by either the trial court or the court of appeals in sentencing or reviewing a sentence. See State v. Richey (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 353, 370, 595 N.E.2d 915, 929; State v. Lott, supra; State v. Landrum, supra, 53 Ohio St.3d 107, 559 N.E.2d 710. See, also, Clemons v. Mississip......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • § 38.07 ATTORNEYS AND THEIR AGENTS DEFINED
    • United States
    • Carolina Academic Press Understanding Evidence (CAP) Title Chapter 38 Attorney-client Privilege
    • Invalid date
    ...Rose v. State, 591 So. 2d 195, 197 (Fla. App. 1991) (medical examiner initially hired by the defense). See also State v. Richey, 595 N.E.2d 915, 922 (Ohio 1992) ("Although the prosecutor's use of a defense expert may violate an accused's attorney-client privilege, [the arson expert] did not......
  • Punish Once, Punish Twice: Ohio's Inconsistent Interpretation of it Multiple Counts Statute
    • United States
    • Capital University Law Review No. 36-3, May 2008
    • May 1, 2008
    ...for one offense that arises out of a discrete unit of 13See, e.g., State v. Bickerstaff, 461 N.E.2d 892 (Ohio 1984); State v. Richey, 595 N.E.2d 915 (Ohio 1992). 14Bickerstaff, 461 N.E.2d at 896. 15OHIO REV. CODE. ANN. § 2903.04(B) (LexisNexis 2006). 16OHIO REV. CODE ANN. § 2919.22(E)(2)(a)......
  • § 38.07 Attorneys and Their Agents Defined
    • United States
    • Carolina Academic Press Understanding Evidence (2018) Title Chapter 38 Attorney-Client Privilege
    • Invalid date
    ...Rose v. State, 591 So. 2d 195, 197 (Fla. App. 1991) (medical examiner initially hired by the defense). See also State v. Richey, 595 N.E.2d 915, 922 (Ohio 1992) ("Although the prosecutor's use of a defense expert may violate an accused's attorney-client privilege, [the arson expert] did not......
  • § 3.05 Order of Trial Proceedings
    • United States
    • Carolina Academic Press Understanding Evidence (2018) Title Chapter 3 Stages of Trial
    • Invalid date
    ...1993) ("Such invective is not unfair per se. . . .") (citing Darden v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 168, 180-81 (1986)).[118] State v. Richey, 595 N.E.2d 915, 924 (Ohio 1992).[119] Keenan, 613 N.E.2d at 209.[120] See Darden v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 168, 181-82 (1986); Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT