State v. Rodriguez, SC04-390.

Decision Date23 June 2005
Docket NumberNo. SC04-390.,SC04-390.
Citation920 So.2d 624
PartiesSTATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Alberto RODRIGUEZ, Appellee.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, Richard L. Polin, Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals, Miami, FL, and Barbara A. Zappi, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Appellant.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Robert Godfrey, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, FL, for Appellee.

WELLS, J.

We have on appeal a decision of the Third District Court of Appeal declaring invalid a state statute. Rodriguez v. State, 906 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). Rodriguez also expressly and directly conflicts with the decision in Sult v. State, 839 So.2d 798 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), (3), Fla. Const.

For the reasons stated in our opinion in Sult v. State, 906 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 2005), we affirm the decision of the Third District in Rodriguez.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and ANSTEAD, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

CANTERO and BELL, JJ., dissent.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT