State v. Roseboro

Decision Date27 January 1982
Citation305 N.C. 155,289 S.E.2d 566
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE of North Carolina v. Louis C. ROSEBORO.

Elisabeth S. Petersen, for defendant.

Lucien Capone, III, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Defendant's notice of appeal and petition for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31, 55 N.C.App. 205, 284 S.E.2d 725. Attorney General's motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 27 January 1982. Petition denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • State v. Casey, 8226SC83
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 19 October 1982
    ...its packaging and labeling to carry the burden. State v. Roseboro, 55 N.C.App. 205, 284 S.E.2d 725 (1981), disc. rev. denied 305 N.C. 155, 289 S.E.2d 566 (1982); State v. Cloninger, 37 N.C.App. 22, 245 S.E.2d 192 (1978); State v. Mitchell, 27 N.C.App. 313, 219 S.E.2d 295 (1975), disc. rev. ......
  • State v. Harrington
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 21 June 2005
    ...to be submitted to a jury. State v. Roseboro, 55 N.C.App. 205, 210, 284 S.E.2d 725, 728 (1981), disc. review denied, 305 N.C. 155, 289 S.E.2d 566 (1982). Moreover, in the present case, Norfleet testified that Rattis used the scale and vacuum sealer found in the kitchen to weigh and package ......
  • State v. Long, 8113SC1096
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 3 August 1982
    ...281 N.C. 1, 187 S.E.2d 706 (1972); State v. Roseboro, 55 N.C.App. 205, 284 S.E.2d 725 (1981), cert. den. and appeal dismissed, 305 N.C. 155, 289 S.E.2d 566 (1982). The evidence in the present case meets both tests. Defendants were sufficiently close to the marijuana to raise an inference of......
  • State v. Brown
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 1 November 1983
    ...contraband is found is not required. State v. Roseboro, 55 N.C.App. 205, 209, 284 S.E.2d 725, 727 (1981), disc. rev. denied, 305 N.C. 155, 289 S.E.2d 566 (1982); State v. Atkinson, supra, 33 N.C.App. at 251, 234 S.E.2d at 773. "[W]here possession of the premises is nonexclusive, constructiv......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT