State v. Rourke, 420P01.
| Decision Date | 20 August 2001 |
| Docket Number | No. 420P01.,420P01. |
| Citation | 553 S.E.2d 396 |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE of North Carolina v. Mardy John ROURKE. |
Mardy John Rourke, Pro Se.
Robert M. Curran, Assistant Attorney General, Rex Gore, District Attorney, for State.
Prior report: 143 N.C.App. 672, 548 S.E.2d 188.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant Pro Se in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th day of August 2001."
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
State v. Bass
...is plain error. SeeN.C.R.App. P. 10(a)(4); see also State v. Rourke, 143 N.C.App. 672, 675, 548 S.E.2d 188, 190,cert. denied,354 N.C. 226, 553 S.E.2d 396 (2001). “For error to constitute plain error, a defendant must demonstrate that a fundamental error occurred at trial.” State v. Lawrence......
-
State v. Poag
...under a plain error review. N.C.R.App. P. 10(c)(4); State v. Rourke, 143 N.C.App. 672, 675, 548 S.E.2d 188, 190, cert. denied, 354 N.C. 226, 553 S.E.2d 396 (2001). Plain error is an error which was "so fundamental as to amount to a miscarriage of justice or which probably resulted in the ju......
-
State v. Hinton
...is plain error. SeeN.C.R.App. P. 10(a)(4); see also State v. Rourke, 143 N.C.App. 672, 675, 548 S.E.2d 188, 190,cert. denied,354 N.C. 226, 553 S.E.2d 396 (2001). “For error to constitute plain error, a defendant must demonstrate that a fundamental error occurred at trial.” State v. Lawrence......
- Farris v. BURKE CO. BD. OF EDUCATION, 272PA01.