State v. Rush, ED 104396

Citation536 S.W.3d 749 (Mem)
Decision Date19 September 2017
Docket NumberED 104396
Parties STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Corliss RUSH, Appellant.
CourtCourt of Appeal of Missouri (US)

Srikant Chigurupati, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Richard A. Starnes, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

ORDER

Corliss Rush appeals from the trial court's entry of judgment and sentence after a jury found him guilty of attempted statutory rape in the first degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2017).

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Davis v. Lakewood Prop. Owners Ass'n, Inc.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • September 19, 2017
    ...maximum annual assessment each year pursuant to the Bylaws' formula, previous increases in the CPI rate have not been "unused." According 536 S.W.3d 749to Lakewood, by recognizing the annual increase in the CPI each year through its calculation of the maximum annual assessment, its Board ha......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT