State v. Sam.

• Decision Date: 06 May 1929
• Docket Number: 27720
• Citation: 154 Miss. 14,122 So. 101
• Court: Mississippi Supreme Court
• Parties: STATE v. SAM. [*]

122 So. 101

154 Miss. 14

STATE v. SAM. ^[*]

No. 27720

Supreme Court of Mississippi

May 6, 1929

(Division B.)

1. INDICTMENT AND INFORMATION. Affidavit charging in same count doing of more than one of acts made offense by statute using disjunctive "or" must use conjunctive "and."

Where a statute making the doing of several things or acts an offense, using the disjunctive "or," the affidavit should, if it charges the doing of more than one of the things or acts in the same count, use the conjunctive "and." An affidavit or indictment which uses the disjunctive, charging in the alternative, is bad.

2. INDICTMENT. AND INFORMATION. Omission of essential element of statutory offense makes affidavit or indictment bad.

In charging statutory offenses, all of the necessary elements of the crime, as defined in the act, must be charged, and the omission of an essential element makes the affidavit or indictment bad.

Division B

APPEAL from circuit court of Lawrence county.

HON. J Q. LANGSTON, Judge.

Prosecution by the state of Mississippi against J. W. Sam for issuing and delivering a check on a bank in which he had insufficient funds on deposit to pay check. From an order sustaining demurrer to the affidavit, the State appeals. Affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

J. A Lauderdale, Assistant Attorney-General, for the state.

REPORTER'S NOTE: No brief was found for appellee in the record.

OPINION

ETHRIDGE, P. J.

The appellee, J. W. Sam, was prosecuted in the justice of the peace court for violating section 942, Hemingway's Code of 1927 (chapter 172, Laws of 1924). He was convicted in this court, and appealed to the circuit court of Lawrence county, where a demurrer to the affidavit was interposed and sustained by the circuit court, and the defendant discharged. The affidavit reads as follows:

"Personally appeared before me, the undersigned authority in and for said county and state, the within named H. E. Graves, who, being by me first duly sworn, says on oath that J. W. Sam, in district No. 1 of said county and state, on or about the 18th day of January A. D. 1928, did lawfully issue and deliver unto Paul Expose, for value, his certain check of the words and figures, as follows:

"'Monticello, Mississippi, Jan. 18, 1928. No.

"'Bank of Monticello:

"'Pay to the order of Paul Expose $ 15.00 Fifteen & No/100 Dollars.

"'J. W. SAM,'

--when he, the said J. W. Sam had insufficient funds on deposit in the said Bank of Monticello with which to pay said check, or after issuing and delivering said check did withdraw or cause to be withdrawn any balance to his credit, without leaving with such bank a sufficient sum to cover said check, and that said check has been duly presented to said bank for payment, and same has not been paid, against the peace and dignity of the state of Mississippi.

H. E. GRAVES.

"Sworn to and subscribed before me this the 7th day of July, A. D. 1928. W. E. Driver, Mayor of Monticello, and ex-officio Justice of the Peace."

The state appeals from the order sustaining the demurrer.

Section 942, Hemingway's Code of 1927, reads as follows:

"If any person shall make, issue and deliver to another person, for value, any check, draft or order on any bank or other depository and thereby obtain from such other person any credit, money, goods or other property of value, and have no funds, or have insufficient funds, on deposit to his credit in said bank or depository with which said check, draft or order may be paid, or who, after having made, issued, uttered or delivered any check or draft or other order for the payment of money upon any bank or other depository shall withdraw or cause to be withdrawn, the money or any part thereof, to the credit of the maker of such draft, check or other order for the payment of money without leaving with such bank or other depository a sufficient sum to cover such check, draft or other order for the payment of money, and same shall not be paid by such bank or depository on presentation, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, if the amount of the check, draft or order be under twenty-five dollars ($ 25), and upon conviction thereof, he shall be fined not less than the amount of such check, draft or order and not exceeding one hundred dollars ($ 100), or imprisoned in the county jail not less than one day nor more than thirty days, or both such fine and imprisonment, at the discretion of the court; and if the amount of the check, draft or order shall be twenty-five dollars ($ 25) or more, he shall be guilty of a felony and on conviction shall be imprisoned in the penitentiary not less than six months nor more than two years, and the drawer of such check, draft or order shall be prosecuted in the county in which he delivered the same, or in the county of the bank or depository on which it is drawn, wherever prosecution may be first begun.

"Prosecution under this act may be begun immediately, but if the person who makes, issues and delivers any such check, draft or order shall, within ten days from the time he receives written notice of the nonpayment of such check, draft or order, pay the same, together with all lawful protest fees, interest and damages, if any, he shall not be prosecuted under this act, and any prosecution that may have been begun within the time above mentioned shall, if payment of such check, draft or order, protest fees, interest and damages, if any, be made as aforesaid, be dismissed on payment of the costs of prosecution by defendant. Said written notice may be given by said bank or other depository or by the payee or drawee in said check, draft or order, or by any officer who shall protest same. And the mailing, postpaid to the last known post office address of the maker, or drawer of such check, draft or order, shall be prima-facie evidence of the receipt of such notice."

It will be seen from a careful reading of this section that the gist of the offense denounced by section 942 is the obtaining from such other person any credit, goods, property or value, and having no funds, or insufficient funds, on deposit to the credit of the maker of the check, etc. In other words, the statute does not intend to inflict the punishment therein prescribed for giving a check without any consideration therefor, or as a gratuity, or in payment of a debt already contracted, but it was intended to prevent the obtaining of property or credit by giving a check under the circumstances named in the statute.

The affidavit does not contain any allegation as to what property or money or credit was obtained by the giving of the worthless check. The...