State v. Scheuschner, 1D01-4630.

Decision Date30 October 2002
Docket NumberNo. 1D01-4630.,1D01-4630.
Citation829 So.2d 943
PartiesSTATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Andreas SCHEUSCHNER, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Felicia A. Wilcox, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Frank Tassone of Tassone & Eler, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on a petition for writ of certiorari from an order declaring a mistrial and excluding the testimony of the state's key witness, Gregory Glover, in the trial of Andreas Scheuschner. See State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla.1988)

(holding the district courts of appeal have the ability to review a pretrial evidentiary order where the state would suffer irreparable harm if the order were not reviewed). The trial court declared a mistrial and excluded Glover as a witness in any future trial based solely upon its determination that Glover's testimony was "not worthy of belief." Determining the credibility of witnesses, however, is within the province of the jury. See Davis v. State, 703 So.2d 1055 (Fla.1997). The trial court violated this clearly established principle of law, and, unless corrected, the erroneous ruling will cause material injury to the state, which will not be susceptible to correction by appeal following the entry of a final judgment because an acquittal would preclude the state from seeking review. Thus, we grant the petition, reverse the trial court's order insofar as it excludes Gregory Glover as a witness in any future trial of Andreas Scheuschner, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

ALLEN, C.J., DAVIS and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Corin v. Goldberg, 3D02-50.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 30, 2002
  • State v. Martin, 4D08-1633.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 11, 2008
    ...its case. State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla.1988); see, e.g., State v. Gerry, 855 So.2d 157 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); State v. Scheuschner, 829 So.2d 943 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); State v. Brown, 782 So.2d 526 (Fla. 1st DCA The trial court excluded Zapata from testifying finding that he had no rele......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT