State v. Schuyler, 79-1386
| Decision Date | 25 November 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 79-1386,79-1386 |
| Parties | The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Michael Craig SCHUYLER, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Janet Reno, State's Atty. and Theda R. James, Asst. State's Atty., for appellant.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Robert R. Schrank and Howard Blumberg, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellee.
Before HENDRY and BASKIN, JJ., and VANN, HAROLD R. (Ret.), Associate Judge.
The state appeals the trial court's order granting defendant's motion to suppress statements, admissions, confessions, and physical evidence. The trial court found the initial stop of the defendant was without probable cause or reasonable suspicion and that the Dade County arresting officer acted beyond his jurisdiction when he arrested defendant Schuyler in Broward County. We affirm.
Off-duty Dade County Public Safety Department Officer Garrison was talking to a neighbor when he noticed defendant Schuyler walking and peering between houses. Because the Dade County neighborhood had recently been the scene of several burglaries, and a search had been conducted an hour earlier for a suspect, he called for police. When questioned, defendant Schuyler explained he was "walking through", and the police departed. Two hours later, Officer Garrison saw defendant and another person who had a bright yellow towel in his hand. He thought "there may be a good possibility that somebody had just removed something that possibly didn't belong to them" and followed the two suspects in his car. When the two men crossed the street into Broward County, 1 Officer Garrison blocked their path and showed his badge and identification while advising them that he was a police officer and that he wanted to find out what was "going on in the area." During Schuyler's response, Officer Garrison looked down at the towel and noticed it took on a familiar shape, the general shape of a firearm. He asked if he could see the towel, and although defendant Schuyler at first refused, Schuyler subsequently handed Officer Garrison the towel stating he had found it. Officer Garrison recognized the bulge in the towel to be a revolver and placed it in the front seat of his car without looking at it. At that point, the two men were under arrest only for the offense of carrying a concealed firearm. Officer Garrison was not aware that another burglary had recently been committed. He knew of the burglary that had occurred earlier in the morning and the "close possibility" that Schuyler matched the description. He thought this gun looked like the gun taken during the first burglary. When Schuyler indicated he had never before been in the neighborhood, Officer Garrison, wishing to investigate further, asked both men to accompany him to a telephone. The two men walked in front of him to a nearby telephone booth, from which he called the 911 number that switched into the Broward County Sheriff's Office. The Broward Sheriff's Office responded and sent for Dade County units as well. Information received by Teletype revealed that the gun belonged to Police Officer Roper, a neighbor of Officer Garrison. Other items taken from Officer Roper were later found to be in defendant Schuyler's pocket. The two men were advised they could be arrested in either Dade County or Broward County, but voiced no objection to walking into Dade County.
By stipulation at the motion to suppress hearing, the court considered only the deposition of Officer Garrison.
The trial court considered two issues: the legality of the stop, and the arrest by Officer Garrison outside his jurisdiction in a case where there was no hot pursuit. The court also decided the nonexistence of probable cause to believe a felony had been committed.
Considering the question of the officer's...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Galicia v. United States
...Benefiel, 1997 WL 117784 **3-4 (Idaho Ct. App. 1997). Garner v. State, 779 S.W.2d 498, 501 (Tex. Ct. App. 1989); State v. Schuyler, 390 So.2d 458, 460 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980). If justification were measured solely by state law governing citizen's arrests, a Border Patrol agent who conduc......
-
State v. Phoenix, s. 80-195
...felony was committed, have no right to stop, much less arrest, a suspect on the grounds of founded suspicion alone. State v. Schuyler, 390 So.2d 458, 460 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). In the sense that an arrest normally results from a police investigation, it can be Pursuant to the "under color of o......
-
Rogers v. Keating
... ... The issue in this case is whether a continuance granted the state for exceptional circumstances during the speedy trial period, but which does not specifically ... ...
-
Edwards v. State, 84-2154
...commits a felony or breach of the peace, or a felony having occurred, the citizen believes this person committed it. State v. Schuyler, 390 So.2d 458, 460 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); and Schachter v. State, 338 So.2d 269, 270 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). Neither Officer Ammons' identification of himself as ......