State v. Scott
| Decision Date | 26 October 1988 |
| Citation | 209 Conn. 821,551 A.2d 758 |
| Parties | STATE of Connecticut v. Donald SCOTT. |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
James E. Mattern, Niantic, in support of the petition.
Mitchell S. Brody, Deputy Asst. State's Atty., in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 16 Conn.App. 172, 547 A.2d 77, is denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
State v. Nguyen, (AC 17107)
...the purpose of a sequestration order has been thwarted." State v. Scott, 16 Conn. App. 172, 182, 547 A.2d 77, cert. denied, 209 Conn. 821, 551 A.2d 758 (1988). That inquiry, however, need not take the form of a formalized evidentiary hearing. See State v. Brown, 235 Conn. 502, 526, 668 A.2d......
-
State v. Lowe
...marks omitted.) State v. Robinson, supra, 230 Conn. 600; State v. Scott, 16 Conn. App. 172, 182, 547 A.2d 77, cert. denied, 209 Conn. 821, 551 A.2d 758 (1988). "The primary purpose of a sequestration order is to ensure that the defendant receives a fair trial by preventing witnesses from sh......
-
State v. Austin, (AC 21815)
...16 Conn. App. 172, 183, 547 A.2d 77 (similarities in testimony wholly explainable by reference to other factors), cert. denied, 209 Conn. 821, 551 A.2d 758 (1988); State v. Sullivan, 11 Conn. App. 80, 85, 525 A.2d 1353 (1987) Further, the defendant has not pointed out, either in his brief o......