State v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.
Decision Date | 21 July 1904 |
Citation | 48 Fla. 129,37 So. 314 |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Parties | STATE ex rel. RAILROAD COM'RS et al. v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RY. |
In Banc. Application by the state, on the relation of the Railroad Commissioners and others, for a writ of mandamus to the Seaboard Air Line Railway. Motion to quash returns. Granted.
Syllabus by the Court
1. The contracts set forth in the statement and opinion under which the Seaboard Air Line Railway controls and operates the Florida West Shore Railway give the former the 'right license, or permission to operate' the latter, and the latter is 'in use' by the former and 'operated by' it under a such a 'contract or agreement' as brings it within the meaning of the railroad commission law (Acts 1899, p. 76, c. 4700), so that the Railroad Commissioners have power under section 6 (page 80) of that law to make reasonable and just rates of freight and passenger tariffs to be observed by the former in the operation of the latter, although under the terms of the contracts the former is not entitled in its own right to the income or profits of the business.
2. In determining whether rates of freight and passenger tariffs established by the Railroad Commissioners for railroad transportation in this state are reasonable, the cost of construction should not be deducted from the estimated earnings under the proposed rates; but the reasonable cost of construction may and should be considered in determining the fair value of the property engaged in transportation.
3. In determining whether rates of freight and passenger tariffs established by the Railroad Commissioners for railroad transportation in this state are reasonable, no part of the earnings or losses from interstate and foreign commerce can be charged to or against the income account of the transportation company; but its interstate and foreign business may and should be considered in determining the proportion of the value of the property of the company assignable to local business and for other purposes.
4. The return to an alternative writ of mandamus seeking to compel a railroad company to put into effect and operation a schedule of tariffs prescribed for it by the Railroad Commissioners which alleges positively and unequivocally that the passenger and freight tariffs prescribed for it by the Railroad Commissioners are unreasonable, and that they do not give to the company fair and reasonable compensation for the services required to be performed by it, is sufficient to tender an issue as to the reasonableness of the rates, without setting up all the facts bearing upon the question of reasonableness and under such an issue any and every fact pertinent to the question of reasonableness is properly admissible.
W. H. Ellis, Atty. Gen., and J. M. Barrs, for plaintiffs.
Geo. P. Raney and John C. Cooper, for defendant. On February 2, 1904, an alternative writ of mandamus issued from this court alleging:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Louisville & N.R. Co.
... ... had for the number and reasonable requirements of patrons at ... different points on the line, and from connecting lines, as ... well as the rights of the carrier ... Where ... it clearly appears that a schedule prescribed by the ... issued by this court: ... 'The ... State of Florida to the Louisville & Nashville Railroad ... Company and the Seaboard Air Line Railway--Greeting: ... 'Whereas, ... by a petition filed by our Railroad Commissioners in our ... Supreme Court in the name of ... ...
-
State v. Florida East Coast Ry. Co.
... ... of the state for the incorporation of railroad companies, ... which on December 25, 1902, and prior thereto, owned and ... operated a main line of railroad wholly within this state, ... beginning at the city of Jacksonville and extending ... generally thence south and along the east coast ... introduction of any pertinent testimony. See State ex ... rel. Railroad Com'rs v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co., ... 48 Fla. 129, 37 So. 314 ... In ... effect the demurrer admits the specific averments of the ... return that 'in ... ...
-
Florida Rate Conference v. Florida R. R. and Public Utilities Commission
...and as an entirety, or in connection with the interstate business concurrently done.' See also State ex rel. Railroad Com'rs v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co., 1904, 48 Fla. 129, 37 So. 314, 320. The reason behind this rule was explained in the following section of American Jurisprudence, where i......
-
General Tel. Co. of Fla. v. Carter
...Court recognized that separation of intrastate business from interstate business was essential in State ex rel. Railroad Commissioners v. Seaboard Air Line Ry., 1904, 48 Fla. 129, 37 So. 314. This holding has been reaffirmed by our later decisions. Separation is not a theoretical problem of......