State v. Sefrit
Decision Date | 12 December 1914 |
Docket Number | 11692. |
Citation | 82 Wash. 520,144 P. 725 |
Parties | STATE v. SEFRIT. |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Department 1. Appeal from Superior Court, Whatcom County; Wm. H Pemberton, Judge.
Frank I. Sefrit was convicted of criminal libel, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded for new trial.
Newman & Kindall, of Bellingham, for appellant.
Frank W. Bixby, Walter A. Martin, Wm. J. Biggar, and Thos. R Waters, all of Bellingham, for the State.
The defendant was tried for criminal libel upon an amended information, the substance of which was as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Amos
...of this Court, pursuant to the laws of this State, and/or the District of Columbia, 28 USC Sec. 3002(15)(c). See State v. Sefrit, 82 Wash. 520, 144 P. 725 (1914); State v. Yelle, 4 Wn.2d 327, 103 P.2d 372 (1940); Nelson v. Bartell, 4 Wn.2d 174, 103 P.2d 30 (1940).Dated this 11th day of Marc......
-
State v. Amos
...of this Court, pursuant to the laws of this State, and/or the District of Columbia, 28 USC Sec. 3002(15)(c). See State v. Sefrit, 82 Wash. 520, 144 P. 725 (1914); State v. Yelle, 4 Wn.2d 327, 103 P.2d 372 Nelson v. Bartell, 4 Wn.2d 174, 103 P.2d 30 (1940). Dated this 11th day of March, 2016......
-
McKillip v. Grays Harbor Pub. Co.
...this section we must keep in mind the facts pleaded, that is, that the charge was made knowing it to be false. In State v. Sefrit, 82 Wash. 520, 144 P. 725, commenting upon this section of the Code, the court said that it is but a statutory declaration of the general doctrine of qualified p......
-
Graham v. Star Pub. Co.
...v. Sundberg, 55 Wash. 144, 104 P. 176, 25 L. R. A. (N. S.) 381; Wells v. Times Printing Co., 77 Wash. 171, 137 P. 457; State v. Sefrit, 82 Wash. 520, 144 P. 725; Wilson v. Sun Publishing Co., supra; Dick v. Pacific Railway Co., 86 Wash. 211, 150 P. 8, Ann. Cas. 1917A, 638; Olympia Waterwork......