State v. Seibert

Decision Date18 November 1889
Citation99 Mo. 122,12 S.W. 348
PartiesSTATE ex rel. BROADWATER v. SEIBERT, State Auditor.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

J. W. Zenely and Silver & Brown, for relator. John W. Wood, Atty. Gen., for respondent.

BRACE, J.

By an act of the general assembly, approved March 9, 1887, the sum of $250,000 was appropriated for the purpose of enlarging the main edifice of the state capitol building, by additions thereto, and the governor, the secretary of state, treasurer, attorney general, and superintendent of pubic schools, and commissioner of the permanent seat of government were constituted a board of commissioners, with authority to contract, in the name of the state, for the necessary materials, and for the performance of the work at a cost not to exceed the appropriation, and to employ a competent architect and superintendent to supervise the same, (Sess. Acts 1887, p. 17;) the contract to provide for the completion of the improvements on or before the 1st day of January, 1889. On or about the 1st of July, 1887, said board contracted for the improvements contemplated in said act, consisting in part of a large addition to the north end of the capitol, and adjacent to the bluff of the Missouri river. In order to secure the foundation for this addition, it was found to be necessary, after the contract was entered into, to construct a retaining wall around and along said bluff, and in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Wells v. Childers
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • October 4, 1945
    ...to condemn such an act. See People v. Board of Supervisors, 52 N. Y. 556; People v. Tremaine, 252 N. Y. 27, 168 N. E. 817; State v. Seibert, 99 Mo. 122, 12 S. W. 348; Dickinson v. Clibourn, 125 Ark. 101, 187 S. W. 909; Arkansas Game and Fish Comm. v. Page, 192 Ark. 732, 94 S.W. 2d 107; McAd......
  • Wells v. Childers
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • October 4, 1945
    ...to condemn such an Act. See People v. Board of Supervisors, 52 N.Y. 556; People v. Tremaine, 252 N.Y. 27, 168 N.E. 817; State v. Seibert, 99 Mo. 122, 12 S.W. 348; Dickinson v. Clibourn, 125 Ark. 101, 187 S.W. Arkansas Game and Fish Comm. v. Page, 192 Ark. 732, 94 S.W.2d 107; McAdoo Petroleu......
  • Longan v. Weltmer
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 1, 1904
    ... ... erroneous. Van Hooser v. Berghoff, 90 Mo. 487. (4) ... The hypothetical questions to the physicians were erroneous ... State" v. Meyers, 99 Mo. 121; 1 Green. Ev., sec. 440, p. 531 ...          H. H ... Blanton, C. G. Burton and W. E. Owen for respondent ...  \xC2" ... ...
  • Peabody v. Russel
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • February 22, 1922
    ...of the appropriation to be specified and definite should be enforced. Dickinson v. Clibourn, 125 Ark. 101, 187 S. W. 909;State v. Seibert, 99 Mo. 122, 12 S. W. 348;Menefee v. Askew, 25 Okl. 623, 107 Pac. 159,27 L. R. A. (N. S.) 537;People v. Kings County, 52 N. Y. 556. In this last case the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT