State v. Sesler

Decision Date23 July 1980
Docket NumberNo. 80-319,80-319
Citation386 So.2d 293
PartiesSTATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Carnell SESLER, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael Kotler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.

Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellee.

SCHEB, Chief Judge.

The state contends that the trial court erred in refusing to impose the mandatory three-year minimum sentence upon Sesler under Section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1979). We agree.

In September of 1979, the state charged Sesler with aggravated battery. A jury found him guilty of aggravated assault with a firearm, a lesser-included offense of aggravated battery. The court withheld adjudication and ordered a presentence investigation. At the sentencing hearing, the state requested that the court sentence Sesler pursuant to Section 775.087(2). The court declined, explaining that because the victim had been partially at fault, it would be a "miscarriage of justice" to imprison Sesler for three years. The court then placed Sesler on five years probation. The court erred because Section 775.087(2) clearly requires a trial court to sentence a defendant convicted of aggravated assault with a firearm to a minimum of three years in prison. See D'Alessandro v. Shearer, 360 So.2d 774 (Fla.1978); State v. Opitz, 357 So.2d 469 (Fla.2d DCA 1978).

While we recognize the problems inherent in the uniform imposition of a minimum sentence, this area is a matter of legislative prerogative and is nondiscretionary. Accordingly, we have no alternative but to remand to the trial court with directions to vacate the prior sentence and impose sentence as required by Section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1979).

BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Nova v. State, 82-1766
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 13, 1983
    ...the Legislature has prescribed a mandatory sentence, a trial court is not empowered to impose any lesser sentence. State v. Sesler, 386 So.2d 293, 294 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); see also State v. De La Rosa, 414 So.2d 26 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); State v. Taylor, 411 So.2d 993 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Of co......
  • Van Buren v. State, 86-2255
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 9, 1987
    ...the original sentence has already begun and the sentence as corrected would be more onerous. Llerena. For example, in State v. Sesler, 386 So.2d 293 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), we entertained an appeal by the state from a sentence of probation imposed for the offense of aggravated assault with a fi......
  • State v. Davis, 93-2835
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 12, 1994
    ...in imposing a three-year minimum mandatory sentence once a defendant is convicted of certain enumerated felonies. See State v. Sesler, 386 So.2d 293 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980) (imposition of minimum sentence is a matter of legislative prerogative and is nondiscretionary). Moreover, the requirement ......
  • Blanton v. State, 78-2518
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 24, 1980
    ...available as to the alleged unfairness of the mandatory sentence imposed, rests with the legislature and not the courts. State v. Sesler, 386 So.2d 293 (Fla.2d DCA 1980). As to the issue of enhancement, it is clear that the two subsections of Section 775.087 serve two different functions. S......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT