State v. Sharp
Decision Date | 31 October 1879 |
Citation | 71 Mo. 218 |
Parties | THE STATE v. SHARP, Appellant. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Nodaway Circuit Court.--HON. H. S. KELLEY, Judge.
REVERSED.
Beech & Lane for appellant.
J L Smith, Attorney-General, for the State.
I. The defendant was indicted for the crime of murder in the first degree; the name of the person on whom the murder was alleged in the indictment to have been perpetrated, was “Martin Edward Hogan.” On trial had the jury by their verdict found the defendant guilty of murder in the first degree, and he was thereupon sentenced in conformity to the verdict.
We shall enter on no discussion of the testimony, as to the degree of homicide which it establishes, as we regard a fatal error as having been committed in the giving by the court, of its own motion, the second instruction on behalf of the State. That instruction is as follows: This instruction is clearly faulty, in that it does not correctly define the word “deliberately.” To constitute murder n the first degree, there must concur willfulness, deliberation, premeditation and malice aforethought. The first instruction clearly stated in general terms what was necessary to constitute the crime of murder in the first degree, but the terms used in that instruction needed to be explained, so that the jury might fully understand their true import. This explanation of the words used in the first instruction was attempted in the second instruction, but with a signal lack of satisfactory results. “Deliberately” is said to mean that which is done in a cool state of the blood. A homicide may be thought of beforehand--that is premeditated and intentionally done--and still, if the element of deliberation be lacking, the homicidal act will be only murder in the second degree; so that it will be readily e en that “deliberately” does not, as defined in the objectionable instruction, mean intentionally or purposely done; otherwise, every act of intentional killing, done with premeditation and malice, would carry with it the element of deliberation, and amount to murder in the first degree, for it is held that “all intentional homicides committed with...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Taylor
... ... Instruction 1 is based on first degree murder and should not have been given. R.S. 1929, par. 3982, and annotations; State v. Fox, 300 S.W. 820; State v. Sharp, 71 Mo. 218; State v. Young, 286 S.W. 29. (13) Instruction 5 should not have been given for there was no competent evidence to the effect that appellant sought or brought on the fight ... Stratton Shartel, Attorney-General, and Don Purteet, Assistant Attorney-General, for ... ...
-
State v. Taylor
... ... "premeditatedly" killing deceased and therefore ... does not charge murder in the first degree. Instruction 1 is ... based on first degree murder and should not have been given ... R. S. 1929, par. 3982, and annotations; State v ... Fox, 300 S.W. 820; State v. Sharp, 71 Mo. 218; ... State v. Young, 286 S.W. 29. (13) Instruction 5 ... should not have been given for there was no competent ... evidence to the effect that appellant sought or brought on ... the fight ... Stratton ... Shartel , Attorney-General, and Don Purteet , ... ...
-
The State v. Prunty
... ... each other that proof of one tends to establish the other ... State v. Hyde, 234 Mo. 226; State v ... Bailey, 190 Mo. 280. (c) Preparation. Kelley's Crim ... Law, sec. 372; State v. Kelley, 65 Vt. 535; ... State v. Rider, 95 Mo. 485; State v. Sharp, ... 233 Mo. 287. (d) Preparation for flight. Underhill, Crim ... Evidence (2 Ed.), sec. 118, p. 220. (3) The footprints and ... automobile tracks were not too remote in point of time or ... distance, nor was the evidence too remote to connect ... appellants with this automobile. Underhill, ... ...
-
State v. Pagels
... ... 534. (12) In the instruction as to the proof necessary to ... entitle defendant to a verdict of not guilty, by reason of ... his insanity, the words, "reasonable satisfaction," ... therein used should have been defined. Digby v. American ... Insurance Co., 3 Mo.App. 603; State v. Sharp, ... 71 Mo. 218; Wiser v. Chesley, 53 Mo. 547; ... Edelmann v. St. Louis Transfer Co., 3 Mo.App. 503 ... (13) The instruction as to partial and general insanity ... should not have been given. State v. Laurie, 1 ... Mo.App. 371; Clark v. Kitchen, 52 Mo. 316. (14) The ... instruction ... ...