State v. Shipman

Decision Date18 December 1894
CitationState v. Shipman, 28 S.W. 842, 125 Mo. 436 (Mo. 1894)
PartiesSTATE, to Use of LAWRENCE COUNTY, v. SHIPMAN et al.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from circuit court, Lawrence county; M. G. McGregor, Judge.

Action by the state of Missouri, to the use of Lawrence county, against James W. Shipman and others, upon a bond. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Reversed.

R. H. Landrum, Gibbs & Jennings, and Henry Brumback, for appellants. W. Cloud and R. H. Davis, for respondent.

GANTT, J.

An action was brought against the defendant and his sureties on his bond as collector of revenue of Lawrence county. There were two counts in the petition; the first charging him with retaining a larger commission on his collections for the year 1887 than allowed him by law, and the second with retaining greater commissions on his collections for 1888 than allowed by law. The finding and judgment on the first count were for defendants, and the county did not appeal. On the second count, the court, sitting as a jury, found for the plaintiff, and gave judgment against the defendant Shipman and his sureties, for $456.25. On the trial it appeared that the collector, at the March term, 1889, made his final settlement with the county court, and fully reported all the taxes chargeable against and collected by him for the year 1888. This settlement shows that he was allowed a commission of 4 per cent. on his collections. It was admitted that the total amount of the taxes extended for 1888 was $66,566.07; that the total sum collected, except for state revenue, was $45,677.74, and the state revenue amounted to $7,320.31. By the statute (section 7640,...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
26 cases
  • Mathias v. Kansas City Stockyards Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 13 Diciembre 1904
    ... ... Frank P. Walsh and E. R. Morrison, for respondent ...         FOX, J. (after stating the facts) ...         Upon this state of facts two propositions are presented for consideration: First. Did the plaintiff assume the risk of injury in the performance of the duties ... ...
  • Lamar Township v. City of Lamar
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 14 Julio 1914
    ... ... Affirmed ...          J. B ... McGilvray and Edwin L. Moore for appellant ...          (1) The ... petition does not state facts sufficient to constitute a ... cause of action. It may state a case against the collector, ... but not against the city which innocently ... Mfg ... Co., 39 Mo.App. 264; Sparks v. Jasper Co., 213 ... Mo. 237; State ex rel. v. Ewing, 116 Mo. 137; ... State ex rel. v. Shipman, 125 Mo. 486; Scott Co ... v. Leftwich, 145 Mo. 34; State ex rel. v ... Hawkins, 169 Mo. 618; Williams v. Carroll Co., ... 167 Mo. 15; ... ...
  • St. Louis, Southern Railway Company of Texas v. Spring River Stone Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 3 Marzo 1913
    ... ... mistake of law, it cannot be recovered back by the party ... making the payment. Campbell v. Clark, 44 Mo.App ... 249; State ex rel. Scotland Co. v. Ewing, 116 Mo ... 129; Corbin v. Adair Co., 171 Mo. 385; Hethcock ... v. Crawford Co., 200 Mo. 170; Trust Co. v ... settlement was binding on the county. A similar case is also ... found in State ex rel. v. Shipman, 125 Mo. 436, 28 ... S.W. 842 ...          In the ... case of Corbin v. Adair County, 171 Mo. 385, 71 S.W ... 674, the circuit ... ...
  • Lamar Tp. v. City of Lamar
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 14 Julio 1914
    ...v. Walsh, 18 Mo. 229; Koontz v. Bank, 51 Mo. 275." The other cases of Scott Co. v. Leftwich, 145 Mo. 34, 46 S. W. 963, State ex rel. v. Shipman, 125 Mo. 436, 28 S. W. 842, State ex rel. v. Ewing, 116 Mo. 129, 22 S. W. 486, and State ex rel. v. Hawkins, 169 Mo. 615, 70 S. W. 119, were all ca......
  • Get Started for Free