State v. Smith

Decision Date21 March 1945
Docket Number220
Citation33 S.E.2d 472,225 N.C. 78
PartiesSTATE v. SMITH.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Objections to portions of charge stating contentions of state reasonably inferable from evidence in the record were waived by accused's failure to object thereto at the time court stated such contentions.

Criminal prosecution upon indictment charging defendant with the crime of arson. G.S. s 14-58.

In the trial court the State offered evidence tending to show these facts: That the two-room house owned and occupied by Lula Stevens, a State's witness and mother of Connie Smith, wife of defendant, situated in Greytown across the river from Smithfield, was burned between 10 and 12 o'clock on the night of 2 September, 1944; that at that time Connie Smith, wife of defendant, and a child of her and defendant, were in bed in the house; that previously Lula Stevens had had the defendant arrested in connection with trouble between him and his wife, and defendant had threatened to get even with her for 'putting the law' on him; that during the afternoon before the fire occurred defendant walked up and down the road in front of the house of Lula Stevens, saying nothing, but looking at her and 'rolling his eyes'; that he came to the house and asked if his wife were there, and on being told that she had gone to town, he whirled around and left; that later he came back and said to Lula Stevens, 'You got my child in your house and I am going to get even with you'; that later on that night Lula Stevens, hearing a noise at the back corner of her house, opened the door and there saw defendant in reaching distance and saw him run into a cornfield; that in a few minutes fire was discovered in the corner of the house on the outside, and Lula Stevens exclaimed 'Lord, have mercy, Ernie has set the house on fire' and that she called for others to bring water, repeating 'Ernie has set the house on fire'. Exception by defendant.

Also the State was permitted, over objection by defendant, to offer testimony of Lula Stevens that previously, when she had heard her daughter screaming, she had said to defendant 'Ernie, what in the world is the matter?', and he replied, 'Connie told Danza a damn lie on me and I tried to break her damn neck '. Exception.

On the other hand, the defendant offered evidence tending to negative the evidence of the State.

Verdict Guilty of the felony of arson whereof he stands charged in the bill of indictment, but with recommendation that he be sentenced to life imprisonment.

Judgment: Confinement in Central Prison at Raleigh, North Carolina, for the term of his natural life.

Defendant appeals to Supreme Court, assigning errors.

Harry M. McMullan, Atty. Gen., and Hughes J. Rhodes and Ralph M. Moody, Asst. Attys. Gen., for the State.

Levinson, Pool & Batton, of Smithfield, for defendant appellant.

WINBORNE Justice.

...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • State v. Church
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • January 7, 1949
    ... ... attention was not called to any misstatement of facts or ... omissions in giving the State's contentions, in time to ... afford an opportunity for correction, these assignments of ... error will not be upheld. State v. Britt, 225 N.C ... 364, 34 S.E.2d 408; State v. Smith, 225 N.C. 78, 33 ... S.E.2d 472; Star Mfg. Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R ... Co., 222 N.C. 330, 23 S.E.2d 32; State v ... Johnson, 219 N.C. 757, 14 S.E.2d 792; State v ... Wagstaff, 219 N.C. 15, 12 S.E.2d 657. Moreover, the ... evidence on this record is sufficient to support the view ... ...
  • State v. Dawson
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • October 29, 1947
    ... ... contentions of the parties, must be called to the attention ... of the Court in time for correction. State v ... Warren, 227 N.C. 380, 42 S.E.2d 350; State v ... Thompson, 226 N.C. 651, 39 S.E.2d 823; State v ... McNair, 226 N.C. 462, 38 S.E.2d 514; State v ... Smith, 225 N.C. 78, 33 S.E.2d 472 ...           We ... have carefully examined the many assignments of error ... directed to the charge of the Court, and we think when the ... charge is considered contextually, as it should be, State ... v. Hairston, 222 N.C. 455, 23 S.E.2d 885; State v ... ...
  • State v. Cogdale
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • December 11, 1946
    ... ... witness' testimony relative to her having called her ... nephew who she knew was not in the house in order to frighten ... the defendant and cause him to leave. This evidence was ... competent as part of the res gestate. State v ... Smith, 225 N.C. 78, 33 S.E.2d 472. Objection is also ... made that certain questions propounded by the Solicitor to ... the prosecuting witness were leading. This Court has ... repeatedly held that as to whether leading questions may be ... asked is in the discretion of the Court. Bank v ... Carr, ... ...
  • State v. Warren
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • April 30, 1947
    ...them. That such was the case seems to have been taken for granted. It was clearly a reasonable, logical and fair deduction. State v. Smith, 225 N.C. 78, 33 S.E.2d 472. At rate, the matter was not called to the court's attention in time to afford an opportunity for correction, and so it is t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT