State v. Smith
| Decision Date | 31 October 1879 |
| Citation | 71 Mo. 45 |
| Parties | THE STATE v. SMITH, Appellant. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Jasper Circuit Court. The case was tried before W. G. MCGREGOR, ESQ., sitting as Special Judge.
REVERSED.
The defendant was indicted for assault with intent to kill, but before trial the indictment was stolen from the clerk's office. A new indictment was then found by the grand jury upon which he was tried and convicted. From this conviction he took this appeal.
Chas. A. Winslow for appellant.
J. L. Smith, Attorney-General, for the State.
Numerous objections are taken to the correctness of the action of the trial court, but as it is unnecessary to notice but one, that one being decisive of this case, we will confine our attention to it. Section 4, page 1087, 2 Wagner's Statutes, provides: “If there be, at any time, pending against the same defendant two indictments for the same offense, or two indictments for the same matter, although charged as different offenses, the indictment first found shall be deemed to be suspended by such second indictment and shall be quashed.” We cannot sanction the view of counsel for the State that “the finding of the second indictment under the statute, ipso facto, quashed the one theretofore found.” It is quite too plain for argument that the statute in question contemplates some action of the court before the first indictment “shall be quashed.” By reason of finding the second indictment the first is only deemed to be suspended; it is not quashed, or even deemed to be quashed. If the Legislature intended that the consequences counsel contend for, should follow the finding of the second indictment, they certainly were very infelicitous in the use of language. It may not be amiss, as illustrating our views in this matter, to cite the language of another statute. Section 8, page 72, 1 Wagner's Statutes, states that “where an executor or administrator shall become non-resident, the court having jurisdiction of the estate of the testator or intestate of such executor or administrator, shall revoke his letters.” And it was contended in the case of State v. Rucker, 59 Mo. 17, that the non-residence of the administratrix, by “operation of law,” accomplished the revocation of her letters. But this court held otherwise, holding that judicial action was necessary to effect the result the statute indicates. The same rule of construction is evidently applicable in the present case. It follows, therefore, that the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Menz
...3550, R.S. 1929; State v. Mayer, 209 Mo. 391, 107 S.W. 1085; State v. Melvin, 166 Mo. 565, 66 S.W. 534; State v. Webb, 74 Mo. 333; State v. Smith, 71 Mo. 45; State v. Williams, 191 Mo. 205, 90 S.W. 448. (a) Defendant's plea to the jurisdiction of the court on account of the failure of the c......
-
State v. Menz
...3550, R. S. 1929; State v. Mayer, 209 Mo. 391, 107 S.W. 1085; State v. Melvin, 166 Mo. 565, 66 S.W. 534; State v. Webb, 74 Mo. 333; State v. Smith, 71 Mo. 45; State Williams, 191 Mo. 205, 90 S.W. 448. (a) Defendant's plea to the jurisdiction of the court on account of the failure of the cou......
-
State v. McCarver
...like any other record, may be supplied by the court of whose record it constitutes a part," citing State v. Simpson, supra, and State v. Smith, 71 Mo. 45. In the case of State v. Walker, 167 Mo. 366, 67 S. W. 228, it is said that "where the certificate of the clerk of the court states that ......
-
Keefe v. District Court of Carbon County
...be deemed to be suspended by such second indictment and shall be quashed." It was held in State v. Eaton, 75 Mo. 586, overruling State v. Smith, 71 Mo. 45, that the finding of second indictment did not ipso facto quash the first. The court said: "The statute suspends the first indictment an......