State v. Smith
Decision Date | 19 December 2002 |
Docket Number | No. 534P02.,534P02. |
Parties | STATE of North Carolina v. Frankie Ray SMITH. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Joseph B. Cheshire, IV, John Keating Wiles, Raleigh, for Smith.
Jill B. Hickey, Assistant Attorney General, for State.
Prior report: 152 N.C.App. 514, 568 S.E.2d 289.
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th day of December 2002."
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State Carolina v. Brown
...568 S.E.2d 289, 295 (evidence of defendant's possession of pornographic materials), disc. review denied, appeal dismissed, 356 N.C. 623, 575 S.E.2d 757 (2002); State v. Doisey, 138 N.C.App. 620, 626, 532 S.E.2d 240, 244–45 (2000) (evidence that defendant placed a camcorder in a bathroom use......
-
State v. Alvarez
...under Rule 404(b) is guided by two constraints: similarity and temporal proximity.") (citation omitted), cert. denied, 356 N.C. 623, 575 S.E.2d 757 (2002). The State offered evidence concerning the robberies by defendant of Severo Peralta, Marchello Young, and Toledo Leopoldo. All three rob......
-
State v. Bush
...times in question. See State v. Smith, 152 N.C.App. 514, 521-22, 568 S.E.2d 289, 294, disc. review denied, appeal dismissed, 356 N.C. 623, 575 S.E.2d 757 (2002). While Rule 404(b) relating to prior bad acts of defendant is generally a rule of inclusion, the evidence offered must be relevant......
-
State v. Delsanto
...therewith on a particular occasion." State v. Smith, 152 N.C.App. 514, 521, 568 S.E.2d 289, 294, disc. review denied, 356 N.C. 623, 575 S.E.2d 757 (2002). Such evidence is only permissible if it is relevant to show something other than a defendant's character or propensity to commit the cri......