State v. Spain
Decision Date | 04 November 1931 |
Docket Number | 321. |
Citation | 160 S.E. 825,201 N.C. 571 |
Parties | STATE v. SPAIN. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Durham County; Frizelle, Judge.
Arthur Spain was convicted of burglary in the second degree, and he appeals.
New trial.
Criminal prosecution tried upon an indictment in which it is charged that the prisoner did, about the hour of 12 o'clock on the night of April 29, 1931, with force and arms, at and in the county of Durham, feloniously and burglariously break and enter the dwelling house of one Mrs. S. P. Arrington, then and there actually occupied by the said Mrs. S. P. Arrington and others, ""with intent the goods and chattels of the said Mrs. S. P. Arrington and others in the said dwelling-house then and there being, then and there feloniously and burglariously to steal, take and carry away against the peace and dignity of the State."
There is a second count in the bill charging the felonious breaking and entry of the said occupied dwelling house, in the nighttime, "with intent the goods and chattels of the said Mrs. S. P. Arrington, in the said dwelling-house then and there being, then and there feloniously and burglariously to steal, take and carry away and then and there in the said dwelling-house of the value of the goods and chattels -- of the said Mrs. S. P. Arrington, in the said dwelling-house then and there being found, then and there feloniously and burglariously did steal, take and carry away against the peace and dignity of the State."
The following testimony of Miss Nellie McLennon was the principal evidence offered against the defendant:
The witness further stated that the window was raised; that she saw a yellow man at the window--saw his face and head inside the screen--that it was the defendant; that she had seen him a number of times before, as he had worked around in the neighborhood for about two years.
When the case was called for trial, and before the jury was impaneled, the solicitor announced that the state would not ask for a verdict of more than burglary in the second degree.
The defendant demurred to the state's evidence and rested his case.
Verdict Guilty of burglary in the second degree.
Judgment Imprisonment in the state's prison of not less than 25, nor more than 30, years.
The defendant appeals, assigning errors.
B. Ray Olive and M. M. Leggett, both of Durham, for appellant.
D. G. Brummitt, Atty. Gen., and A. A. F. Seawell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
STACY, C.J. (after stating the case).
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Bentley
... ... since they are favorable to the accused, it is settled law ... that they will not be disturbed. State v. Robertson, ... 210 [223 N.C. 567] N.C. 266, 186 S.E. 247; State v ... Smith, 201 N.C. 494, 160 S.E. 577; State v ... Cox, 201 N.C. 357, 160 S.E. 358; State v ... Spain, 201 N.C. 571, 573, 160 S.E. 825; State v ... Ratcliff, 199 N.C. 9, 153 S.E. 605; State v ... Johnston, 119 N.C. 883, 26 S.E. 163 ... We ... consider the motion in arrest of judgment. This is predicated ... upon the instructions to the jury that they might find the ... ...
-
State v. Gregory
...to taking a nolle prosequi, or accepting an acquittal, on the capital charge. State v. Brigman, 201 N.C. 793, 161 S.E. 727; State v. Spain, 201 N.C. 571, 160 S.E. 825; State v. Hunt, 128 N.C. 584, 38 S.E. The dying declaration of the deceased was admitted only after proper foundation or pre......
-
State v. Johnson
...precluded the court from submitting the case to the jury on the charge of burglary in the second degree as defined by C.S. § 4232. State v. Spain, supra, and there cited. Speaking to the question in State v. Ratcliff, supra, it was said (199 N.C. 9, 153 S.E. 606): 'There is no evidence on t......
-
State v. Morris
...second degree as requested by the prisoner in his prayer for special instruction. The authorities answer in the negative. State v. Spain, 201 N.C. 571, 160 S.E. 825; State v. Ratcliff, 199 N.C. 9, 153 S.E. It is provided by C.S. § 4641, that upon an indictment for burglary in the first degr......