State v. Stevens
Decision Date | 14 June 1971 |
Docket Number | No. 1,No. 55701,55701,1 |
Citation | 467 S.W.2d 906 |
Parties | STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Arthur STEVENS, Appellant |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen., Kermit W. Almstedt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Daniel P. Reardon, Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.
HIGGINS, Commissioner.
Arthur Stevens, Cecil Smith, and Elijan Scott were charged by information with robbery, first degree, with a dangerous and deadly weapon. Upon separate trial, Cecil Smith was convicted by a jury and sentenced to seven years' imprisonment, and his conviction was affirmed on appeal. State v. Smith, Mo., March 8, 1971, 465 S.W.2d 482. Arthur Stevens was subsequently convicted by a jury of the offense charged, punishment was assessed at seven years' imprisonment, and sentence and judgment were rendered accordingly. §§ 560.120, 560.135, V.A.M.S.
Appellant does not question the sufficiency of evidence to sustain his conviction and the statement from his brief demonstrates that the state made its case:
Appellant's sole contention is that 'the trial court erroneously and unconstitutionally permitted the state to elicit evidence concerning the identifications of the defendant by the victim both in court during trial and during the investigative phase of the case.'
Appellant's argument is that ; and he suggests that United States v. Wade, supra ( ), should not be so strictly interpreted.
This contention was stated, briefed,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Chavez, 56971
...Mo.Sup., 457 S.W.2d 817; Gaitan v. State, Mo.Sup., 464 S.W.2d 33, 35; State v. Richards, Mo.Sup., 467 S.W.2d 33, 37; State v. Stevens, Mo.Sup., 467 S.W.2d 906, 907; State v. Gates, Mo.Sup., 471 S.W.2d 272; State v. Brookins, Mo.Sup., 468 S.W.2d 42, 47. Any lingering question as to the propr......