State v. Sun, 2014-UP-029
Decision Date | 22 January 2014 |
Docket Number | 2014-UP-029 |
Court | South Carolina Court of Appeals |
Parties | The State, Respondent, v. Joseph C. Sun, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2011-200406 |
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
Submitted October 1, 2013
Appeal From Jasper County Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge
Joseph C. Sun, of Bluffton, pro se.
Solicitor Darrell T. Johnson, Jr., of Hardeeville, for Respondent.
Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities:
1. As to whether the circuit court erred in overlooking Joseph C. Sun's response to the magistrates court's return: State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 693-94 (2003) ( ); State v. Policao, 402 S.C. 547, 556, 741 S.E.2d 774, 778 (Ct. App. 2013) ( ); City of Rock Hill v. Suchenski, 374 S.C. 12, 16, 646 S.E.2d 879, 880 (2007) ( ).
2. As to whether the circuit court erred in determining the magistrates court provided Sun sufficient notice of the bench trial: Van Blarcum v. City of N. Myrtle Beach, 337 S.C. 446, 453, 523 S.E.2d 486, 490 (Ct. App. 1999) ( ); State v. Bruce, 402 S.C. 621, 625, 741 S.E.2d 590, 592 (Ct. App. 2013) (); State v. Blackwell-Selim, 392 S.C. 1, 4, 707 S.E.2d 426, 428 (2011) ( ).
AFFIRMED.[1]
---------
Notes:
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
---------
To continue reading
Request your trial