State v. Swims, 45751

Decision Date08 February 1983
Docket NumberNo. 45751,45751
Citation647 S.W.2d 191
PartiesSTATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tracy SWIMS, Appellant.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Henry Robertson, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

John Ashcroft, Atty. Gen., Kristie Green, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, George Peach, Circuit Atty., St. Louis, for respondent.

REINHARD, Judge.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of the offense of robbery in the first degree, a violation of § 569.020, RSMo.1978. He was sentenced to 15 years with the Department of Corrections. He appeals. We affirm.

On July 25, 1981, Mary McCarthy, an architect at Sverdrup & Parcel and Associates, was in the process of moving from St. Louis to Boston. While she was loading items from her apartment into her car, she noticed two males approaching her. The men spoke to her, but she ignored them. After the men walked behind her, one of them put a sharp object, which felt like a knife, to her throat, and jerked her head back. The man with the knife, whom she later identified as Fred McGee, threatened her, stating that either she would be killed or her throat would be slit, and told her to get in the car. While McGee held the knife to her throat, defendant entered the car and sat behind the steering wheel. Ms. McCarthy dropped the car keys in the back seat, but McGee retrieved them. He then jerked her purse off her shoulder, breaking the strap. At that point, defendant said, "Leave her there. Let's go." The men left in the car, without her, but took her purse with over $100.00, and her possessions from her apartment.

The victim phoned the police and gave them a description of the car, including the license plate number. At approximately 2:30 that afternoon, officer Ronald Landa and detective Stephen Landa sighted Ms. McCarthy's car, a brown Oldsmobile, containing two black males. The detectives followed the car which eventually crashed into a fire hydrant and light pole. Defendant and his accomplice tried to escape on foot, but were arrested. Ms. McCarthy's purse, some American Express traveler's checks and other personal items belonging to her were discovered in the car. Ms. McCarthy was driven to the site of the accident and identified defendant and McGee as the robbers.

In defendant's first point on appeal, he contends the trial court erred in refusing to submit an instruction on the lesser-included offense of stealing from the person. Instructions on first and second degree robbery were submitted to the jury.

The verdict director for first degree robbery provided that the jury had to find: 1) that defendant and Fred McGee stole an automobile and purse owned by Mary McCarthy; 2) that Fred McGee threatened the immediate use of physical force on or against Mary McCarthy; and 3) that Fred McGee displayed or threatened the use of what appeared to be a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument.

Robbery in the second degree and stealing are lesser-included offenses of robbery in the first degree. State v. Dickerson, 607 S.W.2d 196, 198 (Mo.App.1980). Stealing is the appropriation of property of another without his consent. § 570.030,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • State v. Williams, 47781
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 25 Febrero 1986
    ...to business cards. Misdemeanor stealing and felony stealing are lesser included offenses under first degree robbery. State v. Swims, 647 S.W.2d 191, 192 (Mo.App.1983). Section 556.046.2 RSMo 1978 requires the trial court to instruct the jury on lesser degrees of the offense charged and on l......
  • State v. Robinson, 51527
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 23 Junio 1987
    ...no contrary evidence. Therefore, the trial court was not obligated to submit an instruction on stealing. See also State v. Swims, 647 S.W.2d 191, 192-193 (Mo.App.1983). Judgment CRIST and KELLY, JJ., concur. 1 These statutes became effective January 1, 1979. ...
  • State v. Meyer, 48485
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 25 Junio 1985
    ...should be reversed. Admittedly robbery in the second degree requires the forcible stealing of property, 1 see, e.g., State v. Swims, 647 S.W.2d 191, 192 (Mo.App.1983). Defendant, however, ignores the fact the victim was forcibly separated from her purse when she was pulled out of the truck.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT