State v. Swofford

Decision Date23 September 2008
Docket NumberNo. ED 89748.,ED 89748.
Citation263 S.W.3d 810
PartiesSTATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Randall C. SWOFFORD, Appellant.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Mark D. Seigel, Judge.

Margaret M. Johnston, Office of the Missouri Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary H. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J, GLENN A. NORTON, J, and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Randall Swofford appeals from his convictions, following a jury trial, of four counts of criminal nonsupport, in violation of Section 568.040, RSMo 2000. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed' facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • SWOFFORD v. State of Mo.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 7 September 2010
    ...him $2,500 on each of the three other convictions. We affirmed movant's convictions and sentences on direct appeal. State v. Swofford, 263 S.W.3d 810 (Mo.App.2008). We issued our mandate on October 16, 2008. Ninety-two days later, on January 16, 2009, movant filed a pro se motion to vacate,......
  • Gierer v. Bank of America
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 23 September 2008

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT