State v. Taylor
Decision Date | 24 June 1901 |
Citation | 64 S.W. 766,107 Tenn. 455 |
Parties | STATE ex rel. BECKHAM v. TAYLOR. |
Court | Tennessee Supreme Court |
Appeal from chancery court, Obion county; Jno. S. Cooper Chancellor.
Bill by the state, on the relation of D. W. Beckham, against G. T Taylor. From a decree granting an injunction, defendant appeals. Reversed.
Hamilton Parks and R. P. Whitesell, for appellant.
R. E Maiden, Lannom & Stanfield, and J. W. Lewis, for appellee.
This is a bill by the state of Tennessee, on relation of D. W Beckham, to enjoin G. T. Taylor from erecting a business house on ground alleged to be a part of a public street. The chancellor granted the relief sought, and the defendant appealed.
In the year 1855, Gen. G. W. Gibbs, owner of the land, laid off and platted a town, which he called "Union City." He sold lots according to his plan on both sides of the numerous streets, including Washington avenue, and in 1867 the town so established, with certain additions, was incorporated by that name. Washington avenue was the broadest of all the streets, being 100 feet wide at every point from one end to the other. It runs east and west, and is intersected by several north and south streets, the easternmost of which is Depot street, and the next, to the westward 120 feet, is First street. Beck and Bransford owned a large part of the block of ground bounded by those two streets, Washington avenue, and its first parallel street on the south, some 500 feet distant. They abutted on the south side of Washington avenue 120 feet, the full width of the block, and had other lots southward. From the east, and opposite that block, near the middle, Harrison street entered Depot street, and there terminated. Such was the situation for years. In 1884 Harrison street was extended through that block directly west to First street; and the width of Washington avenue, for the distance between Depot street and First street, was diminished in the manner, for the purposes and upon the considerations disclosed in the following deed, namely: ' The streets as originally laid out and the changes first referred to are well ilustrated by the appended diagram, in which the extent of the diminution of Washington avenue is represented by the parallelogram inclosing the letter "A," and the territory taken in exchange for extension of Harrison street is represented by the lines surrounding the letter "B":
(Image Omitted)
The board of mayor and aldermen promptly extended Harrison street as indicated, and since that time the extension has been continuously regarded and used as a part of one of the public streets of the town. Beck and Bransford without delay erected a large brick building upon that part of Washington avenue conveyed to them, and they and their successors in title ever...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Little v. City of Chattanooga
...was left with more property following the City's decision to abandon the alley, rather than less. See State v. Taylor, 107 Tenn. 455, 64 S.W. 766, 768-69 (1901) ("[I]ts action in that connection was, nevertheless, in legal contemplation and in fact, an abandonment of its easement . . . , an......
-
Wilkins v. Chicago, St. L. & N.O.R. Co.
...and that upon such abandonment the fee reverts to the adjoining proprietors, if they own to the center of the street ( State v. Taylor, 107 Tenn. 455, 64 S.W. 766), that the city cannot sell the land covered by the street unless it owns the fee (Id), and cannot even then do so in such way a......
-
Harbin v. Smith
... ... Tenn. 197, 65 S.W. 414. Beyond that he had no power of ... control and no right of use not assured to all other ... citizens. State v. Stroud (Tenn. Ch. App.) 52 S.W ... 697. The city held the sidewalk as an easement in trust for ... the public use. State v. Taylor, 107 Tenn ... ...
-
Beadle v. Town of Crossville
... ... waterworks system. By ordinance, the town directed that First ... street be closed, which it has a right to do. State v ... Taylor, 107 Tenn. 455, 64 S.W. 766 ... Complainants ... filed a bill, and later an amended bill setting out some ... ...