State v. The Knights of The Ku Klux Klan
Decision Date | 10 January 1925 |
Docket Number | 24,729 |
Citation | 232 P. 254,117 Kan. 564 |
Parties | THE STATE OF KANSAS, on the relation of CHARLES B. GRIFFITH, Attorney-general, Plaintiff, v. THE KNIGHTS OF THE KU KLUX KLAN et al., Defendants |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Decided January, 1925
Original proceeding in quo warranto.
SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.
1. QUO WARRANTO--Foreign Corporation "Doing Business" in this State Without Permission from the Kansas Charter Board so to Do. A foreign corporation may be ousted from doing business in this state where it has not obtained permission from the charter board so to do, except where its business is protected by the interstate-commerce clause of the constitution of the United States, or is exercised in behalf of the federal government.
2. SAME--A Foreign Corporation Performing in this State All the Functions it is Authorized to Do by Its Charter is "Doing Business" Within the Provisions of the Kansas Foreign Corporation Law. A corporation organized under the laws of another state, not for financial profit, which in this state performs all the functions it is authorized to do by its charter under the laws of the state of its organization, is doing business in this state within the meaning of the Kansas foreign corporation laws.
3. SAME--Certain Transactions of the Defendant Corporation Are Within the Interstate Commerce Clause of the Federal Constitution. Selling lodge paraphernalia, insignia and supplies by a corporation of one state to lodges and persons in another state, on orders from lodge officers in the latter state, is within the protection of the interstate-commerce clause of the constitution of the United States, although the selling corporation retains title to and control of the articles sold.
Charles B. Griffith, attorney-general, John F. Rhodes, and John G Egan, assistant attorneys-general, for the plaintiff.
John S. Dean, Harry W. Colmery, both of Topeka, and W. L. Wood, of Kansas City, for the defendants.
Marshall, J. Hopkins, J., not sitting. Burch, J. concurring specially.
The plaintiff commenced this action to oust the defendants from doing business in this state as a foreign corporation.
The second count alleges that in this state the defendants are engaged in propagating race and religious prejudices and animosities, and are using intimidations, threats and violence to compel others to agree with the defendants and obey their commands.
The answer denies many of the allegations of the petition, admits some of them, and sets out the purposes and objects of the organization known as The Knights of the Ku Klux Klan.
Honorable S. M. Brewster, of Topeka, was appointed commissioner to hear and record the evidence and to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. That has been done.
The findings of fact made by the commissioner include the following:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
American Medical Ass'n v. United States
...v. Commonwealth ex rel. State Corporation Commission, 138 Va. 500, 509, 122 S.E. 122, 125; State ex rel. Griffith v. Knights of Ku Klux Klan, 117 Kan. 564, 572, 573, 232 P. 254, 258, 37 A.L.R. 1267; 17 Fletcher Cyc. Corp. (Perm.Ed.) § 8467. For purposes of compliance with legislation regula......
-
Hazen v. National Rifle Ass'n of America
...Chattanooga Nat. Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. Denson, 189 U.S. 408, 23 S.Ct. 630, 47 L.Ed. 870; State ex rel. Griffith v. Knights of Ku Klux Klan, 117 Kan. 564, 572-574, 232 P. 254, 258, 259, 37 A.L.R. 1267, appeal dismissed 273 U.S. 664, 47 S.Ct. 453, 71 L.Ed. 829; Knights of Ku Klux Klan v. Comm......
-
Young America's Found. v. Doris A. Pistole Revocable Living Trust
...the application of their foreign corporation laws to not-for-profit corporations. For instance, in State ex rel. Griffith v. Knights of Ku Klux Klan, 117 Kan. 564, 232 P. 254 (1925), the Kansas Supreme Court considered whether the Ku Klux Klan, a not-for-profit corporation organized under t......
-
Mechanical Contractors Ass'n v. Mechanical Con. A. of N. Cal.
...Subcommittee of Management of Grand United Order of Odd Fellows, 1924, 208 App.Div. 100, 203 N.Y.S. 149; State v. Knights of Ku Klux Klan, 1925, 117 Kan. 564, 232 P. 254, 37 A.L.R. 1267, appeal dismissed, 1927, 273 U.S. 664, 47 S.Ct. 453, 71 L.Ed. 829; Knights of Ku Klux Klan v. Commonwealt......
-
The Diversity Corner
...State (1st ed. 1957); and (3) Territorial Kansas Reader (Virgil W Dean ed., 2005). [2] See also State v. Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, 117 Kan. 564, 232 P 254 (1925). --------- ...