Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United States | 1-800-335-6202

State v. Thompson

Document Cited in 3 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
Decision Date23 August 2006
Docket Number2006-1021.
Citation2006 Ohio 4276,110 Ohio St.3d 1456-1471,852 N.E.2d 1215
PartiesState v. Thompson.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

852 N.E.2d 1215

110 Ohio St.3d 1456-1471

2006 Ohio 4276

State v. Thompson.

2006-1021.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

August 23, 2006.

Allen App. No. 1-05-34, 2006-Ohio-2004.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Thompson v. Williams
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of West Virginia
    • February 5, 2010
    ... ... the statutory maximum generally does not ... impose cruel and unusual punishment ... Austin v. Jackson, 213 F.3d 298, 302 (6th ... Cir.2000). Petitioner's sentence was within the statutory maximum, and judges in ... Ohio have discretion to order that sentences run consecutively. State v. Foster, ... 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 845 N.E.2d 470 (2006) ... Additionally, petitioner's argument that his ... sentence is cruel and unusual when compared with sentences that others have received for committing similar crimes lacks ... merit because the Constitution does not ... require ... ...
  • State v. Thompson, 2007 Ohio 773 (Ohio App. 2/26/2007), 1-06-63.
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • February 26, 2007

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT