State v. Thompson

Decision Date02 June 1884
Citation19 N.W. 730,32 Minn. 144
PartiesState of Minnesota v. William F. Thompson
CourtMinnesota Supreme Court

Case certified from the district court for Hennepin county, Young, J., presiding.

Cause remanded, with directions to dismiss the same.

J. G. Woolley, for the State.

Hart & Brewer, for defendant.

OPINION

The Court.

At the February term, 1883, three indictments were found against the defendant, charging several offences of embezzlement. He was then arraigned upon one only of these indictments. At the following term, May, 1883, he was tried and acquitted. He was then arraigned upon another of the indictments. The trial was continued from term to term, and is now pending. At the May term, 1884, the defendant was arraigned upon the third indictment. Three terms of court intervened between that at which the indictments were found and that at which the last arraignment was made. The defendant moved that this last indictment be dismissed. No sufficient cause is shown for the delay of the state in proceeding to an arraignment. Reasons which may have been sufficient for the continuance of the trial upon the other indictments were not a sufficient cause for not arraigning the defendant upon all indictments against him. The indictment should have been dismissed.

Cause remanded, with directions to dismiss the same.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Bohen v. City of Waseca
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • June 11, 1884
    ... ... time, and for a long time before, and to the defendant's ... "full knowledge," the awning had been dangerous and ... unsafe. This state of facts is a sufficient answer to ... counsel's suggestion of hardship in imposing an ... immediate liability upon municipal corporations for ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT