State v. Thompson, 87909-5
| Decision Date | 07 March 2013 |
| Docket Number | NO. 87909-5,87909-5 |
| Citation | 299 P.3d 1172,176 Wash.2d 1023 |
| Parties | State v. Curtis Shane Thompson |
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Petition For Review: Denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
State v. Rocha
...makes its way to the appellate courts. E.g., State v. Thompson, 169 Wash.App. 436, 453–54, 290 P.3d 996 (2012), review denied,176 Wash.2d 1023, 299 P.3d 1172 (2013); State v. Chamberlin, 161 Wash.2d 30, 36–37, 162 P.3d 389 (2007); State v. Leon, 133 Wash.App. 810, 812, 138 P.3d 159 (2006); ......
-
State v. Gonzalez-Guzman
...or a complete breakdown in communication. State v. Thompson, 169 Wn. App. 436, 457, 290 P.3d 996 (2012), review denied, 176 Wn.2d 1023, 299 P.3d 1172 (2013). The breakdown must prohibit the lawyer from providing effective assistance. For example, in Thompson, the court found no good cause f......
-
State v. Potts
...entrusted to defense counsel, not the defendant." State v. Thompson, 169 Wn. App. 436, 459, 290 P.3d 996 (2012), rev. denied, 176 Wn.2d 1023, 299 P.3d 1172 (2013). As for the second and third reasons cited by Potts, they do not demonstrate a "complete breakdown in communication" between Pot......