State v. Thompson, No. 2010–1373.

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Ohio
Writing for the CourtFRENCH, J.
Citation2014 Ohio 4751,141 Ohio St.3d 254,23 N.E.3d 1096
Decision Date29 October 2014
Docket NumberNo. 2010–1373.
Parties The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. THOMPSON, Appellant.

141 Ohio St.3d 254
23 N.E.3d 1096
2014 Ohio 4751

The STATE of Ohio, Appellee,
v.
THOMPSON, Appellant.

No. 2010–1373.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Submitted April 8, 2014.
Decided Oct. 29, 2014.


23 N.E.3d 1110

Sherri Bevan Walsh, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and

23 N.E.3d 1111

Richard S. Kasay, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Rachel Troutman and Kimberly S. Rigby, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant.

FRENCH, J.

141 Ohio St.3d 254

{¶ 1} This is an appeal as of right by appellant, Ashford L. Thompson, who has been sentenced to death for the aggravated murder of Twinsburg Police Officer Joshua Miktarian. For the reasons below, we affirm Thompson's convictions and sentence.

141 Ohio St.3d 255

I. BACKGROUND

{¶ 2} Following the murder of Officer Miktarian, the state charged Thompson with two counts of aggravated murder under R.C. 2903.01(B) and (E). Each count carried three death specifications: purposely killing a law-enforcement officer, R.C. 2929.04(A)(6), killing to escape detection, R.C. 2929.04(A)(3), and killing while under detention, R.C. 2929.04(A)(4). The state also charged Thompson with two counts of escape, two counts of resisting arrest, three counts of tampering with evidence, and one count of carrying a concealed weapon. Every count of the indictment also carried at least one firearm specification.

{¶ 3} Thompson's jury trial commenced in 2010.

A. The State's Case in Chief

1. Rav's Bar

{¶ 4} A little after midnight on July 13, 2008, Thompson picked up his girlfriend, Danielle Roberson, and they drove to Rav's Creekside Tap and Grill ("Rav's Bar"). The bartender, John Jira, recognized Thompson as a regular customer who typically ordered one beer and never caused trouble. That night, Jira served Thompson a single Budweiser draft at 12:30 or 1:00 a.m.

{¶ 5} Rav's Bar patron Steven Bartz testified that he saw a woman and a man, whom he later identified as Thompson, sitting at the bar that night. He said he had heard Thompson making angry comments. According to Bartz, Thompson was drinking a beer, was "slamming his glass on the bar," and "was pretty drunk." Bartz heard Thompson say to his companion, "There's demons in me" and "I will kill any one f* * *er that threatens me." Bartz also testified that Thompson said, "Nobody understands the s* * * I've done and am capable of doing. I can't even talk about it."

2. Traffic Stop

{¶ 6} Around 1:50 a.m. on July 13, Miktarian was en route to the Twinsburg police station. He was wearing a police uniform and driving a marked police cruiser. His police dog, Bagio, was with him.

{¶ 7} Miktarian began following Thompson's car near the intersection of State Route 91 and Glenwood Drive. Another driver, Natalie Spagnolo, testified that she saw a police cruiser turn on its lights and follow a car onto Glenwood Drive that night. The car was playing music so loudly that she could hear it over her own loud music even though her windows were up.

{¶ 8} At about 1:55 a.m., Miktarian called dispatch to report a traffic stop at a residence on "Glenwood near 91." Thompson had pulled into his driveway on

141 Ohio St.3d 256

Glenwood, and Miktarian pulled into the driveway behind him. Miktarian provided the license plate number—"ITNL." Approximately two minutes later, he requested backup.

{¶ 9} The dispatcher, Christine Franco, ran the license-plate number on the Law Enforcement Data System at 1:55 a.m.

23 N.E.3d 1112

Her search revealed that the owner of the vehicle had a license to carry a concealed firearm. Moments after Miktarian requested backup, Franco reported, "The only thing I know is he has a—he has a right to carry." Miktarian did not respond.

{¶ 10} Officer Patrick Quinn heard Miktarian's backup request over the radio and "figur[ed] something was possibly wrong." He responded, asking Miktarian "what he had." Miktarian did not answer, so Quinn "ran to [his] cruiser and then left the station with [his] lights and sirens activated."

{¶ 11} Moments later, the dispatcher received a phone call from Thompson's next-door neighbor, Mary Spisak. Around 2:00 a.m., Spisak woke to the sound of yelling outside her open window. She heard five popping sounds and called to report "shooting and arguing in the next-door neighbor's yard." The dispatcher relayed this information to Miktarian, but he still did not respond.

{¶ 12} Three other witnesses testified that they had heard popping sounds near 2454 Glenwood Drive around the same time. Two of the witnesses, Douglas Szymanski and Joseph Werling, were stopped in a car at the intersection of State Route 91 and Glenwood Drive when they saw the lights of a police cruiser 200 to 300 feet away and heard four gunshots. They drove onto Glenwood and saw a police cruiser parked in a driveway with its overhead lights on.

{¶ 13} Officers quickly arrived at the scene. Officer Quinn arrived first and saw Miktarian's cruiser with its lights on, but no other vehicles. Another officer arrived and saw Miktarian on the ground next to his cruiser. Miktarian had no vital signs when emergency medical services arrived.

{¶ 14} Thompson's driver's license and insurance card were in Miktarian's front shirt pocket.

3. Thompson's Arrest

{¶ 15} Twinsburg police enlisted the assistance of other local law enforcement to locate Thompson. Around 2:00 a.m., the Bedford Heights Police Department received notice that Thompson had a prior address in their jurisdiction, on Cambridge Drive. Three officers went to investigate.

{¶ 16} Around 2:20 a.m., Sergeant David Sandoval, Officer Anthony Vanek, and Officer Kimberly Callieham arrived at the Cambridge Drive address. They saw three people—two women and one man—standing in the driveway. Vanek also saw a vehicle with the license plate "ITNL" parked inside an open garage at the top of the driveway.

141 Ohio St.3d 257

{¶ 17} Vanek began to question one of the women, Bridget Robinson, and she said that she was Thompson's sister. While Vanek was inquiring about Thompson's whereabouts, he heard a loud disturbance inside the house. He realized that the other woman, later identified as Danielle Roberson, had left the driveway.

{¶ 18} Vanek approached the house and opened the screen door; the main door was already open. He saw a man—later identified as Thompson—who had a pair of handcuffs hanging off his right wrist. Vanek confronted Thompson in the kitchen, and a struggle ensued. One officer seized a Kel–Tec 9 mm handgun from the stovetop, and another arrested Thompson and took him into custody.

4. Physical Evidence

{¶ 19} At booking, Sergeant Greg Feketik photographed Thompson, his clothes and shoes, a small cut on his wrist, and the handcuffs he was wearing, which were marked with Miktarian's badge number. Later forensic testing confirmed the presence

23 N.E.3d 1113

of blood with a DNA profile consistent with Miktarian's DNA profile on Thompson's left shoe, watchband, and shirt and on the barrel of the recovered gun.

{¶ 20} Dr. Darin Trelka, then a deputy coroner for Cuyahoga County, performed an autopsy on July 14, 2008. Trelka classified Miktarian's death as a homicide and determined that he died from four gunshot wounds to the head.

{¶ 21} Officers from the crime-scene unit photographed and documented the scene at Glenwood Drive and collected evidence. They recovered three spent bullets, and the medical examiner recovered a fourth bullet from Miktarian's skull during the autopsy.

{¶ 22} On the driveway, the crime-scene-unit officers found a pair of Miktarian's handcuffs and his Taser, which had been activated but not fired. Miktarian's handgun was still in a triple-retention holster on his duty belt.

{¶ 23} Officers also recovered a broken liquor bottle next to the sidewalk in front of Thompson's house. Two officers observed, but did not collect, a small, yellowish-grey, chewed-up food substance on the driveway. They later believed that the substance was garlic, because a search of Thompson's car uncovered a baggie containing garlic cloves. Detective Jason Kline explained that sometimes persons who have been drinking chew garlic when talking to police to cover the odor of alcohol on their breath.

{¶ 24} Inside Thompson's home, officers found a receipt documenting his purchase of a Kel–Tec 9 mm handgun. The serial number of the gun listed on the receipt matched the number on the gun found at the house on Cambridge Drive, and subsequent ballistics testing confirmed that the spent bullets and shell casings recovered from the crime scene had been fired from that gun.

141 Ohio...

To continue reading

Request your trial
194 practice notes
  • Patton v. Warden, Case No. 3:17-cv-078
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. Southern District of Ohio
    • June 19, 2017
    ...error on claimed error challenging the admissibility of the evidence on confrontation and hearsay grounds. See State v. Thompson, 141 Ohio St. 3d 254, 2014-Ohio-4751, 23 N.E.3d 1096, ¶ 174.[*P39] The Ohio Supreme Court has identified the standard for noticing plain error:First, there must b......
  • State v. Smith, 20CA3934
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Ohio)
    • February 2, 2022
    ...Ohio St.3d 173, 182, 510 N.E.2d 343 (1987). "An abuse of discretion is more than a mere error of law or judgment." State v. Thompson, 141 Ohio St.3d 254, 2014-Ohio-4751, 23 N.E.3d 1096, ¶ 91; accord State v. Johnson, 144 Ohio St.3d 518, 2015-Ohio-4903, 45 N.E.3d 208, ¶ 75. Instead, "'[a] tr......
  • State v. Montgomery, No. 2012–1212.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Ohio
    • August 24, 2016
    ...cases. We have previously rejected each of Montgomery's challenges to Ohio's capital-punishment scheme. See, e.g., State v. Thompson, 141 Ohio St.3d 254, 2014-Ohio-4751, 23 N.E.3d 1096, ¶ 279–280 (listing cases).{¶ 144} Montgomery also argues that Ohio's 148 Ohio St.3d 379death-penalty stat......
  • State v. Dailey, Case No. 18CA1059
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Ohio)
    • October 10, 2018
    ...429, 2015-Ohio-3954, 45 N.E.3d 127, ¶ 198. "An abuse of discretion is more than a mere error of law or judgment." State v. Thompson, 141 Ohio St.3d 254, 2014-Ohio-4751, 23 N.E.3d 1096, ¶ 91; accord State v. Johnson, 144 Ohio St.3d 518, 2015-Ohio-4903, 45 N.E.3d 208, ¶ 75. Page 7Instead, "'[......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
194 cases
  • Patton v. Warden, Case No. 3:17-cv-078
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. Southern District of Ohio
    • June 19, 2017
    ...error on claimed error challenging the admissibility of the evidence on confrontation and hearsay grounds. See State v. Thompson, 141 Ohio St. 3d 254, 2014-Ohio-4751, 23 N.E.3d 1096, ¶ 174.[*P39] The Ohio Supreme Court has identified the standard for noticing plain error:First, there must b......
  • State v. Smith, 20CA3934
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Ohio)
    • February 2, 2022
    ...Ohio St.3d 173, 182, 510 N.E.2d 343 (1987). "An abuse of discretion is more than a mere error of law or judgment." State v. Thompson, 141 Ohio St.3d 254, 2014-Ohio-4751, 23 N.E.3d 1096, ¶ 91; accord State v. Johnson, 144 Ohio St.3d 518, 2015-Ohio-4903, 45 N.E.3d 208, ¶ 75. Instead, "'[a] tr......
  • State v. Montgomery, No. 2012–1212.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Ohio
    • August 24, 2016
    ...cases. We have previously rejected each of Montgomery's challenges to Ohio's capital-punishment scheme. See, e.g., State v. Thompson, 141 Ohio St.3d 254, 2014-Ohio-4751, 23 N.E.3d 1096, ¶ 279–280 (listing cases).{¶ 144} Montgomery also argues that Ohio's 148 Ohio St.3d 379death-penalty stat......
  • State v. Dailey, Case No. 18CA1059
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Ohio)
    • October 10, 2018
    ...429, 2015-Ohio-3954, 45 N.E.3d 127, ¶ 198. "An abuse of discretion is more than a mere error of law or judgment." State v. Thompson, 141 Ohio St.3d 254, 2014-Ohio-4751, 23 N.E.3d 1096, ¶ 91; accord State v. Johnson, 144 Ohio St.3d 518, 2015-Ohio-4903, 45 N.E.3d 208, ¶ 75. Page 7Instead, "'[......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT