State v. Tiernan

Decision Date23 November 1909
Citation223 Mo. 142,122 S.W. 728
PartiesSTATE v. TIERNAN.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court; Geo. H. Shields, Judge.

William Tiernan was convicted of fraudulent registration, and he appeals. Affirmed.

C. Orrick Bishop, for appellant. E. W. Major, Atty. Gen., and Jas. T. Blair, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

GANTT, P. J.

On the 21st day of September, 1908, the grand jury of the city of St. Louis returned an indictment charging defendant, William Tiernan, with fraudulently registering under a name not his own in the Eighth election precinct of the Fifteenth ward of the city of St. Louis. Defendant was arraigned and pleaded not guilty. A jury was impaneled and sworn to try the issue thus made. Their deliberations resulted in a verdict of guilty and the infliction upon defendant of a penalty of three years' imprisonment in the penitentiary. Motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment were duly filed and overruled, judgment was entered upon the verdict, and defendant appealed.

In due time defendant filed his bill of exceptions. The state's evidence tended to show: That a general registration of voters was held in the city of St. Louis on the 14th, 15th, 16th, and 17th of September, 1908; that the registration booth for the Eighth precinct of the Fifteenth ward in said city was at 819 North Twenty-First street; the registration judges in the precinct named were John J. Hickey, August O. Huesser, Fred Reitz, and Joseph Byrne, and the clerks were Louis Hoffman and John Gallagher, all duly commissioned except Byrne, who was sworn in to fill a vacancy. The judges were furnished with cards containing a form of oath to be administered to those applying for registration, and also furnished with a list of questions as to their qualifications, to be answered by such applicants. On one of the days mentioned, while the registration was in progress, defendant presented himself before the judges and clerks of registration of the Eighth precinct of the Fifteenth ward of the city of St. Louis at 819 North Twenty-First street, as charged. The prescribed oath was administered to him and the formal questions propounded as to his qualifications to vote at that place. His answers were such as, if true, to show him to be a qualified voter of said precinct...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Mowry v. Norman
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 27, 1909
    ... ... that dominion at the time the will was executed, then the ... finding should be against the will. Such doctrine is not the ... law of this State. There are influences over the mind of a ... testator which the law condemns, and others which it commends ... -- influences upon which society ... ...
  • Mowry v. Norman
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 27, 1909
    ... ... cast upon him as to the question of mental incapacity asked and received instructions fully as broad, if not broader, than the case law of the state. With this situation, the plaintiffs asked the instruction quoted above. They now say this instruction was error because this court had indicated ... ...
  • The State v. O'Brien
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • May 26, 1910
    ... ... examination of the record and the contentions made by ... appellant in the trial court discloses that substantially all ... the questions presented are settled by the recent decisions ... of this court in the cases of State v. Cummings, 206 ... Mo. 624; State v. Tiernan, 223 Mo. 142; State v ... Keating, 223 Mo. 86; State v. Exnicious, 223 ... Mo. 61, and State v. Thavanot, 225 Mo. 545. (2) The ... indictment charges that defendant represented that his name ... was John Murphy, and that he registered under and signed that ... name. The registration records ... ...
  • State v. O'Brien
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • May 26, 1910
    ... ...         The indictment in this case was not assailed in the lower court, it being identical in its charging parts with the indictments approved in State v. Cummings, 206 Mo. 624, 105 S. W. 649; State v. Exnicious, 122 S. W. 730; State v. Tiernan, 122 S. W. 728. The Exnicious Case is directly in point here. In that case the court said: "The indictment charges that he registered under the name `Joseph Walters,' and that his proper name was that of Harry Exnicious, the name under which he was indicted. The testimony clearly shows that the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT