Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United States | 1-800-335-6202

State v. Treesh

Document Cited in 5 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
Decision Date12 May 1999
Citation709 N.E.2d 848,85 Ohio St.3d 1476
PartiesState v. Treesh NO. 99-274
CourtOhio Supreme Court

Page 1476

85 Ohio St.3d 1476

709 N.E.2d 848

State v. Treesh

NO. 99-274

Supreme Court of Ohio.

May 12, 1999

DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL

CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND

DISCRETIONARY APPEALS,

IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED

Lake App. No. 97-L-080.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Treesh v. Bagley
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • July 13, 2010
    ...summarily dismissed Treesh's appeal, concluding that it did not present a substantial constitutional question. State v. Treesh, 85 Ohio St.3d 1476, 709 N.E.2d 848 (1999).C. Federal Habeas Corpus Proceedings In 2002, Treesh filed the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus. The district c......
  • Treesh v. Robinson
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Ohio
    • November 15, 2012
    ...1998); State v. Treesh, 90 Ohio St.3d 460 (2001); State v. Treesh, 1998 WL 946528 (Ohio Ct. App. 11th Dist. Dec. 21, 1998); State v. Treesh, 85 Ohio St.3d 1476 (1999). B. First Federal Habeas Petition On June 10, 2002, Treesh filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in this Court pursuant......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT