State v. Trexler
Decision Date | 31 January 1815 |
Citation | 4 N.C. 188,2 Car. L. Rep. 90 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | STATE v. TREXLER. |
1. When there is one continuing transaction, though there may be several distinct asportations in law, yet the party may be indicted for the final carrying away, and all who concur are guilty, though they were not privy to the first or the intermediate acts.
2. The snatching a thing unawares is not considered a taking by force; but if there be a struggle to keep it, or any violence done to the person, the taking is robbery.
3. Where the prosecutor accidentally, in the presence of the prisoner, dropped some papers out of his pocketbook, among others a bank note of $100. and the prisoner took it up and refused to deliver it, whereupon a struggle ensued between the prosecutor and the prisoner for the possession of the note, which resulted in the prisoner's retaining possession and running off with the note, it was held that, as the bank note was not the subject of larceny, it was a forcible trespass.
THE defendant had been tried and found guilty on an indictment for a trespass in taking from Hughes, the prosecutor, a bank note of $100. On a motion for a new trial, it was agreed that this Court should decide whether the facts alleged in the following affidavit of Hughes, the prosecutor, constitute an indictable trespass or not, and a new trial to be awarded or refused, accordingly.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Baker
...others are legislative creations. State v. Phipps, 32 N.C. 17; State v. Love, 19 N.C. 267; State v. Flowers, 6 N.C. 225; State v. Trexler, 4 N.C. 188, 6 Am.Dec. 558; G.S.Ch. 14, art. 22. They fall into three when tested by their social objectives. Some, e. g., the crime of unlawfully cuttin......
-
State v. Oliver
...the offense of robbery the property taken must be such as is the subject of larceny." Guffey at 333, 144 S.E.2d at 16. See State v. Trexler, 4 N.C. 188 (1815); 46 Am.Jur. Robbery § 8 at p. 142 (1943). The indictment in the instant case describes the property as "drugs and United States curr......
-
State v. Rogers, 247
...is the subject of robbery. To constitute the offense of robbery the property taken must be such as is the subject of larceny. State v. Trexler, 4 N.C. 188; 46 Am.Jur., Robbery, s. 8, p. 142. * * * ' State v. Guffey, 265 N.C. 331, 144 S.E.2d 14. In the instant case there is allegation and pr......
-
State v. Partlow, 271
...is the subject or robbery. To constitute the offense of robbery the property taken must be such as is the subject of larceny. State v. Trexler, 4 N.C. 188; 46 Am.Jur., Robbery, See. 8, p. Former jeopardy, being based on the fundamental legal principal that a person cannot be tried twice for......