State v. Ulen

Decision Date26 May 1993
Citation625 A.2d 1378,226 Conn. 905
PartiesSTATE of Connecticut v. Craig ULEN.
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court

Suzanne Zitser, Asst. Public Defender, in support of the petition.

Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., Asst. State's Atty., in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 31 Conn.App. 20, 623 A.2d 70(AC 10436), is denied.

BERDON, J., would grant certification.

To continue reading

Request your trial

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
26 cases
  • State v. Schiappa
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • 23 Marzo 1999
    ...claims does not make such claims constitutional in nature." State v. Ulen, 31 Conn. App. 20, 37, 623 A.2d 70, cert. denied, 226 Conn. 905, 625 A.2d 1378 (1993). In circumstances where, as here, the defendant cannot establish that the unpreserved claim of an improper jury instruction violate......
  • State v. Streater
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • 26 Enero 1995
    ...to present the exception out of the hearing of the jury." See State v. Ulen, 31 Conn.App. 20, 36, 623 A.2d 70, cert. denied, 226 Conn. 905, 625 A.2d 1378 (1993). Our Supreme Court has found that "[t]he failure of the defendant to state distinctly the matter being objected to immediately aft......
  • State v. Graham
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • 23 Marzo 1994
    ...supra. Such evidence may also be used to establish knowledge; State v. Ulen, 31 Conn.App. 20, 28, 623 A.2d 70, cert. denied, 226 Conn. 905, 625 A.2d 1378 (1993); or to complete the story of the charged crime "by placing it in the context of nearby and nearly contemporaneous happenings." (In......
  • State v. Taylor
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • 13 Junio 1995
    ...43 (1992), cert. denied, 225 Conn. 904, 621 A.2d 287 (1993)." State v. Ulen, 31 Conn.App. 20, 28, 623 A.2d 70, cert. denied, 226 Conn. 905, 625 A.2d 1378 (1993). "[E]vidence is relevant if it has a tendency to establish the existence of a material fact. State v. Mastropetre, 175 Conn. 512, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT