State v. Vance, 78425-6.
| Decision Date | 06 March 2007 |
| Docket Number | No. 78425-6.,78425-6. |
| Citation | 159 Wn.2d 1011,152 P.3d 1032 |
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Robert L. VANCE, Petitioner. |
ORDER
¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Alexander and Justices Madsen, Bridge, Owens and J.M. Johnson (Justice Sanders sat for Justice Madsen), at its March 6, 2007, Motion Calendar, considered whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted and remanded to the Court of Appeals Division One for reconsideration in light of State v. VanDelft, 158 Wash.2d 731, 147 P.3d 573 (2006).
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
State v. Vance
...731, 147 P.3d 573 (2006), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 2876, 167 L.Ed.2d 1172 (2007). State v. Vance, noted at 159 Wash.2d 1011, 152 P.3d 1032 (2007). ¶ 4 Before us now for the third time, on direct appeal from the most recent sentences imposed based on the jury's 2003 verdicts, Va......
-
State Of Wash. v. Vance
...of our then recently decided case, In re Personal Restraint of VanDelft, 158 Wash.2d 731, 147 P.3d 573 (2006). See State v. Vance, 159 Wash.2d 1011, 152 P.3d 1032 (2007). ¶ 7 In VanDelft, we construed Blakely to require that a jury, not a judge, must make factual determinations supporting e......
- Munro v. State Dept. of Employment Sec., 78337-3.