State v. VanHook

Decision Date31 October 1885
Citation88 Mo. 105
PartiesTHE STATE v. VANHOOK, Appellant.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Barry Circuit Court.--HON. W. F. GEIGER, Judge.

REVERSED.

J. M. Patterson for appellant.

B. G. Boone, Attorney General, for the state.

HENRY, C. J.

The defendant was indicted and convicted for selling beer on Sunday. He has appealed from the judgment of the circuit court, and the only error assigned which we deem it necessary to notice, is the failure of the record to show any arraignment of the defendant, and “this, under repeated adjudications, must accomplish the reversal of the judgment.” State v. Jaques, 68 Mo. 260; 53 Mo. 234. After the jury is sworn and the trial proceeds, and all the testimony relates to the guilt or innocence of the accused, in a misdemeanor case, it looks like trifling with justice to reverse the judgment, because the record fails to show an arraignment and plea of not guilty; but it has been held in a number of cases that this is a fatal error, and it is for the legislature, and not for this court to change the law on the subject. Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • State v. O'Kelley
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 24, 1914
    ...and plea was fatal, without citing any authority, and without discussing the effects of the amendment of the statute. In State v. Vanhook, 88 Mo. 105, the court said: "After the jury is sworn and the trial proceeds, and all the testimony relates to the guilt or innocence of the accused, in ......
  • The State v. Fitch
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • May 26, 1914
    ...arraignment and plea was fatal without citing any authority and without discussing the effects of the amendment of the statute. In State v. Vanhook, 88 Mo. 105, the court said: "After the jury is sworn and the trial proceeds, and all the testimony relates to the guilt or innocence of the ac......
  • State v. O'Kelley
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • June 9, 1913
    ... ... Many of the ... decisions seem to follow form rather than substance and to ... adhere to precedents solely because they are precedents, ... forgetting that when the reason on which a rule of law is ... based changes the law itself changes with it. [ State v ... Vanhook, 88 Mo. 105.] ...          The ... very frequency with which this question comes before the ... appellate courts, as well as our limited experience with the ... practice in trial courts, shows that the matter of ... arraignment and entering a plea has [173 Mo.App. 184] ceased ... to ... ...
  • State v. Poynter
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • October 31, 1921
    ...there was nothing to try; if the record failed to show an arraignment and plea prior to trial, the proceedings were a nullity. In State v. Vanhook, 88 Mo. 105, that court held that failure of the record to show a plea was fatal, and it was for the legislature, not the court, to change the l......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT