State v. Walsh

Decision Date28 June 1912
Citation76 N.H. 581,84 A. 42
PartiesSTATE v. WALSH.
CourtNew Hampshire Supreme Court

Transferred from Superior Court, Strafford County; Plummer, Judge.

James W. Walsh was indicted for rape. To the denial of a motion to quash the indictment, defendant excepted, on the ground that a witness before the grand jury was incompetent. Transferred from superior court. Exceptions overruled.

George T. Hughes, of Dover, for the State.

Arthur L. Foote and Walter W. Scott, both of Dover, for defendant.

YOUNG, J. It is not customary for the court to quash an indictment merely because it may have been produced by the testimony of an incompetent witness. Commonwealth v. Woodward, 157 Mass. 516, 32 N. E. 939, 34 Am. St. Rep. 302; State v. Fassett, 16 Conn. 457: 17 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law, 1283, note 7; 20 Cyc. 1347, note 18.

Exception overruled. All concurred.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • State v. Blake
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • 29 Marzo 1973
    ...86 S.Ct. 1416, 1419 n. 3, 16 L.Ed.2d 510, 514 n. 3 (1966). Nor would the use of the testimony of an incompetent witness. State v. Walsh, 76 N.H. 581, 84 A. 42 (1912). Under the common law, the workings of grand juries were not hampered by evidentiary rules. Costello v. United States supra. ......
  • State v. Fox
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 24 Enero 1916
    ...can not be quashed for lack of competent or sufficient testimony. 36 Iowa 272; 39 S.W. 365; 48 So. 819; 60 Id. 379; 60 S.E. 283; 88 P. 867; 84 A. 42; 148 S.W. 567; 23 So. 486, 505; 62 N.Y.S. 224; Cyc. 422; 145 F. 745; 156 Id. 897; 186 Id. 1002-1018; 199 Id. 25, 831; 38 Am. Rep. 460; 82 Ark.......
  • Opinion of the Justices
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • 11 Mayo 1950
    ...Since not every irregularity impedes justice or is fatal to the proper administration of the functions of grand juries, State v. Walsh, 76 N.H. 581, 84 A. 42, and since the specific correction thereof is usually a matter for the presiding justice, State v. Canatella, 96 N.H. ----, 72 A.2d 5......
  • State v. Lambertino
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 20 Agosto 1935
    ...the quality of proof presented to the grand jury. The contrary seems to be the rule. Pick v. State, 143 Md. 192, 121 A. 918; State v. Walsh, 76 N. H. 581, 84 A. 42. It should be noted that the objections to the indictment were not timely. They were presented after the plea was entered, and ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT