State v. Walton-Merritt

Decision Date09 August 2022
Docket NumberWD 84698
Citation648 S.W.3d 926 (Mem)
Parties STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Arieous Kahlil WALTON-MERRITT, Appellant.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Julia E. Rives, for Respondent.

Joellen Grohs, for Appellant.

Division Three: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick, Judge and W. Douglas Thomson, Judge

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Arieous Walton-Merritt appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, for involuntary manslaughter and armed criminal action. Walton-Merritt presents two points on appeal. In his first point, Walton-Merritt contends that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for new trial and in entering convictions because the evidence was insufficient to sustain the jury's findings of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In his second point, Walton-Merritt argues that the trial court abused its discretion in overruling his motion to strike Venireperson 14 for cause. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT