State v. Washington
Decision Date | 19 February 1930 |
Docket Number | No. 30128.,30128. |
Citation | 24 S.W.2d 1010 |
Parties | STATE v. WASHINGTON. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Cooper County; H. J. Westhues, Judge.
George Washington was convicted of receiving stolen goods, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
J. E. Whitlow and W. H. Martin, both of Boonville, for appellant.
Stratton Shartel, Atty. Gen., and Smith B. Atwood, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
By an information filed in the circuit court of Cooper county, the defendant was charged with receiving stolen goods of the value of $100, knowing the same to have been stolen. The jury found him guilty and assessed his punishment at imprisonment in the penitentiary for two years. He was sentenced accordingly, and appealed.
No bill of exceptions was filed, and the record proper only is here for our review. Nor has the defendant filed any brief.
Omitting formal parts, the information and the verdict read as follows:
The information embodies every element of the offense sought to be charged, as defined by the statute, and is sufficient in form and in substance. Section 3331, R. S. 1919; State v. Johnson (Mo. Sup.) 285 S. W. 422; ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Bright
...having received.' We need not here set forth the indictment. It is substantially in the form approved in this court in State v. Washington, Mo.Sup., 24 S.W.2d 1010, 1011, and State v. Derrington, Mo.Sup., 137 S.W.2d 468, 469-470. The date of the receipt by defendant of the goods allegedly t......
- State v. Bryant
- State v. Bryant
-
State v. Derrington
... ... The ... information embodies every element of the offense sought to ... be charged, as defined by the statute, and is, therefore, ... sufficient in form and substance. Section 4083, R.S.Mo.1929, ... Mo.St.Ann. § 4083, p. 2886; State v. Washington, Mo ... Sup., 24 S.W.2d 1010; State v. Johnson, ... Mo.Sup., 285 S.W. 422; State v. Batterson, ... Mo.Sup., 274 S.W. 43 ... The ... next assignment of error is that 'the Court erred in ... permitting the State to introduce evidence as to the purchase ... of a shotgun, ... ...