State v. West Missouri Power Co.
Decision Date | 12 March 1926 |
Docket Number | No. 25128.,25128. |
Citation | 281 S.W. 709 |
Parties | STATE ex inf. CHANEY, Pros. Atty., v. WEST M1SSOURI POWER CO. et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; Willard P. Hall, Judge.
Proceeding in quo warranto by the State, ex informatione W. L. Chaney, Prosecuting Attorney for Johnson County, against the West Missouri Power Company and others. From a judgment of ouster, respondents appeal. Reversed.
W. E. Suddath, of Warrensburg, H. O. Maxey and De Armond & Maxey, all of Butler, and Busby, Sparrow & Patterson, of Kansas City, for appellants.
H. J. Salisbury, of Brownington, Walter L. Chaney, M. D. Aber, and S. J. Caudle, all of Warrensburg, and Charles E. Morrow, of St. Louis, for respondent.
This is a proceeding in quo warranto. The respondent West Missouri Power Company is a public service corporation, engaged, among other things, in maintaining and operating an electric power and lighting system in the city of Warrensburg. The information challenges its right to occupy the streets and alleys of that city with its poles, transmission lines, and other structures and appliances incident to and necessary for the conveyance and proper distribution of electric current which it furnishes the public. The cause was instituted in Johnson county, but was tried in the circuit court of Jackson county, to which it was sent on change of venue. The trial resulted in a judgment of ouster. From that judgment this appeal is prosecuted by respondent, who, unless designated by its proper corporate name, will hereinafter be referred to as appellant.
There were a number of other corporations named as respondents in the information, but, as their interests, if any, are merely incidental or subordinate to that claimed by West Missouri Power Company, no further notice will be taken of them.
As appellant has fairly set forth, in respect to completeness and accuracy, the facts which its evidence on the trial tended to show, we adopt its statement with some slight additions:
"On September 20, 1889, the city of Warrensburg, then and now a city of the third class, by ordinance enacted by its council, granted a franchise to Walter K. Freeman, his heirs or assigns, authorizing the erection, maintenance, and operation of an electric plant and system in said city, and the placing of poles and wires in the streets and alleys thereof."
That ordinance (deleting portions not pertinent to this controversy) was as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Missouri Electric Power Co. v. Smith, 37419.
... 155 S.W.2d 113 ... MISSOURI ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, ... FORREST SMITH, State Auditor ... No. 37419 ... Supreme Court of Missouri ... Division One, July 25, 1941 ... Rehearing Denied, October 30, 1941 ... [155 ... 180. (b) Powers granted to municipal corporation are to be strictly construed and all doubts resolved against it. State ex inf. Chaney v. West Mo. Power Co., 313 Mo. 283, 281 S.W. 709 ... Roy McKittrick, Attorney General, and Arthur O'Keefe, Assistant Attorney General, ... ...
-
State ex Inf. McKittrick v. Mo. Pub. Serv. Corp., 36189.
... 174 S.W.2d 871 ... STATE OF MISSOURI, on the Information of ROY McKITTRICK, Attorney General, ex rel. CITY OF TRENTON, Relator, ... Sikeston v. Mo. Utilities Co., 53 S.W. (2d) 394, 331 Mo. 337; State ex inf. Jones v. West End L. & P. Co., 152 S.W. 76, 246 Mo. 653; State ex rel. Kansas City v. Ry. Co., 41 S.W. 955, 140 ... because, when the ordinance granting such franchise was passed, the city council was without power to grant an electric franchise. Special Charter, Laws, 1871, 478; Secs. 951, 952, R.S. 1879; City ... ...
-
City of Clayton v. Nemours
... ... No. 26134 ... St. Louis Court of Appeals, Missouri ... Opinion filed October 6, 1942 ... Motion for rehearing overruled ... 845-846; Sec. (2), B. (3) The Legislature has granted power to the City of Clayton to regulate automobile traffic within its limits ... 1939. (b) In all of the decisions of the appellate courts of this State, prosecutions for violation of city ordinances are uniformly held to be ... make a right turn from Clayton Road into Glen Ridge Avenue, while the west lane permits a right turn at all times from Glen Ridge Avenue into Clayton ... ...
-
Cook v. Tide Water Associated Oil Co.
...831(2)], instruments conveying the right granted by ordinance to erect and operate an electric system [State ex inf. Chaney v. West Missouri Power Co., 313 Mo. 283, 281 S.W. 709, 714(7)], a deed containing building restrictions [Finley v. Glenn, 303 Pa. 131, 154 A. 299, 301(4, 5)], separate......