State v. Weston
Decision Date | 10 April 1973 |
Citation | 325 A.2d 457,164 Conn. 635 |
Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
Parties | STATE of Connecticut v. Charles WESTON. |
Igor I. Sikorsky, Jr., Special Public Defender, for the appellant (defendant).
Jerrold H. Barnett, Asst. State's Atty., with whom, on the brief, were Arnold Markle, State's Atty., and John J. Kelly, Asst. State's Atty., for the appellee (state).
Before HOUSE, C.J., and SHAPIRO, LOISELLE, MacDONALD and BOGDANSKI, JJ.
Upon a jury trial, the defendant was convicted of the crime of selling heroin in violation of § 19-480(a) of the General Statutes and has appealed from that conviction.
We find ourselves in complete agreement with the concluding sentences of the state's brief on this appeal: Hartford National Bank & Trust Company v. Redevelopment Agency of the City of Bristol, 164 Conn. (--, 321 A.2d 469) .
Notwithstanding this situation, we have considered the substance of the arguments pressed by the defendant in argument on the appeal and conclude that they are without merit or have been sufficiently answered by the decisions of this court in State v. Brown, 163 Conn. 52, 301 A.2d 547, and State v. Cari, 163 Conn. 174, 303 A.2d 7.
There is no error.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Moye
...court to consider that claimed error, not simply as a matter of procedure; Practice Book, 1978, §§ 3054(c)(3), 3063; State v. Weston, 164 Conn. 635, 636, 325 A.2d 457 (1973); State v. Grayton, 163 Conn. 104, 109, 302 A.2d 246, cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1045, 93 S.Ct. 542, 34 L.Ed.2d 495 (1972)......
-
State v. Ralls
...sixty-three assignments of error advanced by the defendant, thirty have not been briefed and are considered abandoned. State v. Weston, 164 Conn. 635, 636, 325 A.2d 457; State v. Bitting, 162 Conn. 1, 3, 291 A.2d The remaining thirty-three assignments of error, variously presented, form the......
-
Morrissey-Manter v. Saint Francis Hosp. & Med. Ctr.
...See Barros v. Barros, 309 Conn. 499, 503 n. 4, 72 A.3d 367 (2013) (claim deemed abandoned for inadequate briefing); State v. Weston, 164 Conn. 635, 636, 325 A.2d 457 (1973) (claim not briefed on appeal, although argued during oral argument, treated as abandoned); Braham v. Newbould, 160 Con......
-
Olson v. Mohammadu
...Barros v. Barros , 309 Conn. 499, 503 n.4, 72 A.3d 367 (2013) (claim deemed abandoned for inadequate briefing); State v. Weston , 164 Conn. 635, 636, 325 A.2d 457 (1973) (claim not briefed on appeal, although argued during oral argument, treated as abandoned); Braham v. Newbould , 160 Conn.......