State v. Whitelock
| Decision Date | 10 June 1936 |
| Docket Number | 25992. |
| Parties | STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. WHITELOCK et al., Appellants. |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
Appeal from Court of Appeals, Cuyahoga County.
Payer, Corrigan, Cook & Pilliod, of Cleveland, for appellants.
Frank T. Cullitan, Pros. Atty., and Thomas A. Burke, Jr., both of Cleveland, for the State.
It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.
Appeal dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Public Utilities Commission of Ohio v. United Fuel Gas Co
... ... commerce, that the two companies were wholly independent of one another, and that the Commission therefore went beyond the power of the state in asserting jurisdiction to fix the rates to be charged for gas sold by United to the Portsmouth Gas Company. United recognized, however, the ... ...
-
State v. Theisen
... ... 306 ... In State v. Norman, 80 Ohio App. 510, 77 N.E.2d 76, the court holds that an order sustaining a demurrer to a plea of former jeopardy is not a judgment or final order, citing Whilock v. State, 21 Ohio Law Abst. 393, appeal dismissed, State v. Whitelock, 131 Ohio ... St. 332, 2 N.E.2d 777, and State [108 N.E.2d 857] v. Smith, 135 Ohio St. 292, 20 N.E.2d 718, also relating to interlocutory orders ... Although the General Assembly may not enlarge the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals, it may nevertheless enact legislation which ... ...
-
State v. Roberts
... ... The overruling of a plea in abatement is not a final order from which an appeal may be prosecuted. Bogard v. State, 9 Ohio Law Abst. 436; Whitlock v. State, 21 Ohio Law Abst. 393 (appeal dismissed by Supreme Court, State v. Whitelock, 131 ... Ohio St. 332, 2 N.E.2d 777); State v. James, 33 Ohio Law Abst. 256 (appeal to Court of Appeals dismissed); 2 Ohio Jurisprudence (2d), 624, Section 50 ... Section 2953.02, Revised Code, which provides for a review of 'judgment or final order' in a criminal case, and ... ...
-
State v. Norman
...all appeals in criminal cases to a 'judgment or final order.' Whitlock v. State, 21 O. L. A. A. 393, appeal dismissed, State v. Whitelock, 131 Ohio St. 332, 2 N.E.2d 777. Section 6 of Article IV of the Constitution, this court can only 'review * * * judgments or final orders of * * * courts......