State v. Widman
Decision Date | 30 October 1916 |
Docket Number | 18923 |
Citation | 72 So. 782,112 Miss. 1 |
Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Parties | STATE v. WIDMAN |
APPEAL from the circuit court of Pike county, HON. J. B. HOLDEN Judge.
Will Widman was charged by affidavit before a justice of the peace with failing to pay a dog tax. Demurrer to affidavit sustained, affidavit quashed and state appeals.
The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.
Reversed.
Ross Collins, Attorney-General, for the state.
Price & Price and F. D. Hewitt, for appellee.
This is an appeal under the provisions of section 40 of the Code of 1906, providing, among other things specified therein, that the state or any municipal corporation may prosecute an appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to, or a motion to quash, an indictment or an affidavit charging crime.
Will Widman was charged by an affidavit in the justice of the peace court in Pike county with failing and refusing to pay a tax on a dog levied under the provisions of chapter 148 of the Laws of 1910 put into operation in said county by an order of the board of supervisors on the 5th day of February, 1914.
Chapter 148 of the Laws of Mississippi of 1910 provides for a per capita tax of one dollar upon each and every male dog over six months old, and the sum of three dollars upon every female dog over six months old, to be collected from the owner, keeper, or harborer of any such dog. This act leaves it optional with each county whether or not its provisions shall be put in operation therein, and provides two methods whereby the counties may elect to put said law into operation: First, the board of supervisors may of its own motion levy the tax in question; second, on the failure of the board to levy the tax in question on petition in writing of twenty per cent. of the qualified electors the board of supervisors must submit to the qualified electors of the county at an election the question of this levy, and upon a vote of a majority of those voting at such election the board of supervisors is required to enter an order levying the tax in question.
"When any county shall have once levied said tax the board of supervisors shall levy said tax each succeeding year until the same shall be voted down by the majority of the electors at an election to be held for that purpose upon petition for the same in the same way and manner as provided herein for initiating the same."
The above-mentioned law was put in force in Pike county by order of the board of supervisors on the 5th day of February, 1914 and remained the law in Pike county until the 3d day of April, 1915, when an election was held as provided in said statute, and the same was suspended from operation in said county by a vote of the people.
The following affidavit in a justice of the peace court in Pike county was made against the appellee Will Widman:
A demurrer was filed to this affidavit by the defendant, setting out the following grounds of demurrer:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Tatum v. Wheeless, Unemployment Compensation Commission
... ... A., section 301 et seq..; ... section 904, 42 U.S.C. A., section 1104) ... 2 ... The ... state Supreme Court is not hound by a federal court's ... decision concerning the meaning or constitutionality of a ... state statute under the State ... 367; Clarksdale Ins. Agency v. Cole, ... 87 Miss. 637, 40 So. 228; State v. Gulf & R. Co., ... 138 Miss. 70, 104 So. 689; State v. Widman, 112 ... Miss. 1, 72 So. 782; Jackson Fertilizer Co. v. State Tax ... Commission, 173 Miss. 183, 162 So. 170; Southern ... Package Corp. v ... ...
-
Clark v. State
... ... 2 ... Cooley on. Taxation 1094; Bank v. Worrell, 67 Miss ... 47; Cooley on Constitutional Limitations, sec. 678; ... Barataris Canning Co. v. State, 58 So. 769; ... Johnson v. Drainage District, 59 So. 921; ... Holberg v. Macon, 55 Miss. 112; State v. Widman, 112 ... Miss. 1, 72 So. 782 ... The ... legislature has a wide discretion in classifying the subjects ... of police regulation, and a legislative classification will ... not be annulled by the courts, unless it is wholly without a ... reasonable or practical basis ... ...
-
Mississippi State Tax Commission v. Flora Drug Co
...Worrell, 67 Miss. 47, 7 So. 219; Holberg v. Town of Macon, 55 Miss. 112; Postal Tel. & C. Co. v. Robertson, 116 Miss. 204; State v. Widman, 112 Miss. 1, 72 So. 782; Knisely v. Cotterel, 196 Pa. 614, 50 L. R. A. In the collection of any tax of whatever nature and character some person is goi......
-
Cooper v. Oregon Short Line Railroad Co.
...Lewis v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 70 N.J.L. 132, 1 Ann. Cas. 156, 56 A. 128; Southern R. Co. v. Moore, 108 Va. 388, 61 S.E. 747; State v. Widman, 112 Miss. 1, 72 So. 782.) Negligence is not actionable unless shown to be the proximate cause of the injury. (Southern Ry. Co. v. Crawford, 164 Ala. ......